Ornery.org
  Front Page   |   About Ornery.org   |   World Watch   |   Guest Essays   |   Contact Us

The Ornery American Forum Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» The Ornery American Forum » General Comments » Yet More Disturbing World Events

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Yet More Disturbing World Events
Crazy Eddie
Member
Member # 790

 - posted      Profile for Crazy Eddie     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
This from ABC News...

quote:
QINGDAO, China Sept. 23 — Greeted by jubilant crowds and traditional lion dancers, two naval ships returned Monday after completing China's first around-the-world military cruise a four-month voyage to show off the country's growing military power.

Relatives waved bouquets as the guided missile destroyer Qingdao and its support ship tied up at a pier in this eastern Chinese port. Sailors and officers in white dress uniforms lined the decks.

The ships left May 15 on the voyage that took them to a dozen countries, including the United States and Russia, and through the Panama and Suez canals.

Rear Adm. Ding Yiping, commander of China's East Sea Fleet and senior officer on the voyage, said it was meant to show off China's "powerful and civilized" navy and outward-looking policies.

"We were carrying out an important diplomatic and military task on a trip of peace and friendship," Ding said at a press conference on the pier. "If today's China were still a closed-off, backward country, it would be impossible to undertake this sort of round-the-world cruise."

The ships also visited Canada, Singapore, Egypt, Turkey, Ukraine, Greece, Portugal, Brazil, Ecuador and Peru during the 132-day trip.

During the welcome ceremony, hundreds of dancers and musicians waved red scarves, twirled batons and danced energetically in costumes depicting lions and dragons traditional images of good luck.

Ding said the voyage taught Chinese sailors important lessons about navigation, communications and operating at great distances from home.

He said it set new distance and duration records for China. Communist China's navy made its first foreign voyage in 1985.

Many in the United States and China's neighbors, especially Japan, are wary of Beijing's rising military spending and what they see as its growing willingness to assert itself militarily.

China boosted its publicly announced military budget this year by 17.6 percent to $17 billion, adding to more than a decade of double-digit annual increases for the 2.5 million-member People's Liberation Army. Foreign military analysts say China's true military spending is as much as five times that amount.

Ding dismissed fears of China's rising military might, insisting it was purely for defense and to ensure the country's territorial integrity.

"The so-called 'China threat theory' is groundless and cannot hold water," he said.

Robert Karniol, Asia Pacific editor of Jane's Defense Weekly, called the voyage a significant part of China's effort to develop a "blue water" navy a force that can operate far from home for months at a time.

It also fits into China's recent strategy of using its military to burnish the national reputation, he said.

In a sign of the secretive Chinese military's growing desire to court public opinion and cultivate foreign ties, foreign reporters were given rare permission to walk the decks of the Qingdao on Monday.

After passing marines armed with Kalashnikov rifles guarding the gangplank, journalists were allowed to examine a helicopter that lands on a pad on the stern and anti-torpedo charges fired from tubes on deck.

The reporters weren't allowed below decks.

The ship, designed and built in China and christened in 1996, was in immaculate condition, with fresh paint and gleaming brass fittings on the bridge.

The Qingdao is far from China's most powerful vessel. Beijing also owns a pair of Sovremenny-class destroyers bought from Russia that are armed with nuclear-capable missiles.

Crew members wouldn't discuss technical details, including the ship's navigation technology. China's military is believed to use the satellite-based Global Positioning System run by the U.S. government a reliance on foreign technology that commanders are reluctant to admit.

Petty Officer Wei Ping said his favorite port stop was in Turkey.

"It was really a beautiful country, and we received a very warm welcome," Wei said. He said some crew members became seasick from never having been on the rolling open ocean.

Zhang Ruofei, commander of the Qingdao's antisubmarine warfare unit, grinned as he cradled his 3-month-old daughter, who was born while he was at sea.

"I'll remember this trip all my life," he said, "but now I'm so happy to be back home."


The obvious historical analogy that springs to mind is the "Great White Fleet" which the US send on a world cruise from 1907-1909. The purpose then was to demonstrate the US's newfound sea power, and I don't think that this cruise by the Chinese is any different.

While there is certainly a difference in the scale of the two cruises, the essential message China is sending is the same as the one the US was sending: We have the ability to project military power anywhere in the world. While the quantity of the power that China can project is currently limited, a foundation has been laid for the expansion of China's capabilities.

What strikes me most is the blatant falsehood of Rear Admiral Ding in this article, when he states that China's military forces are only for territorial self-defense. If that is the case, why go to the considerable expense of sending a destroyer around the world? There is a major difference between a fleet designed for coastal protection and one designed to project power elsewhere. The US possesses the latter of the two, and it seems that this is what China is seeking to develop. Does Rear Admiral Ding really think the world is stupid enough to buy the idea that a round-the-world cruise helped to develop China's coastal defense capabilities? (Of course, he was speaking to reporters...)

Regards,
Crazy Eddie


Posts: 24 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Junpei
Member
Member # 690

 - posted      Profile for Junpei     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
>> Does Rear Admiral Ding really think the world is stupid enough to buy the idea that a round-the-world cruise helped to develop China's coastal defense capabilities? (Of course, he was speaking to reporters...)

I think he was just playing politics. Even though it's really obvious what China is doing, no one's going to be truthful about it.


Posts: 146 | Registered: May 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tom Grey - Tigger
Member
Member # 741

 - posted      Profile for Tom Grey - Tigger   Email Tom Grey - Tigger   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Everard should be happy -- a commie country gaining the ability to project military power.

It's certainly a future threat. Red China's territorial integrity, of course, includes Formosa (now called Taiwan).


Posts: 493 | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Everard
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Tigger-
China is communist by implication only. Their government has nothing to do with communism. Want a disertation?

Method one of spotting a nation that isn't really a communist nation... They have someone in charge.


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Crazy Eddie
Member
Member # 790

 - posted      Profile for Crazy Eddie     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
China's economic preferences really don't disturb me in one way or the other. What worries me is China's tendency to slowly expand by taking over their nearest neighbors (Tibet and the Mischief Islands come immediately to mind, with the ROC and the Spratley Islands probably next in line.) This blue-water navy demonstration indicates that they are not interested in remaining a regional power, but in expanding their reach across the globe.

Combined with other disturbing military acquisitions (the FT-2000 and FT-2000A "AWACS killer" SAMs spring to mind - an AWACS is a sophisticated piece of hardware, and not many nations operate them; Taiwan, the US, and Russia being notable examples of countries that do) I see a picture of a China that is gearing up to be a major world player in this new century. If I was a nation bordering China, I would be evaluating my defensive options very carefully at this point. While China may not intend to go head-to-head with the US, it certainly appears (based on the AWACS killer and China's non-counterforce-capable nuclear arsenal) that they intend to deter us from becoming involved in any regional conflicts. This, in turn, suggests that the Chinese are planning for future regional conflicts, does it not?

Regards,
Crazy Eddie

[Edited to fix an unclear pronoun.]

[This message has been edited by Crazy Eddie (edited September 24, 2002).]


Posts: 24 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Everard
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I certainly agree that China is gearing up to be a world player again.

What would scare, me, though, is a long range under-sea navy. Surface ships are tactical weapons, and as such can be dealt with. Long range nuclear equipped submarines are strategic weapons. As china is short on the strategic weapons end, at the moment, I believe its in our best interests to start trying to confront china at some point soon. Unfortunately, as I wrote in another thread, the war on terrorism eats up too many resources to focus on China, if we try to contain that nation.

I sometimes wonder if Bush is TRYING to get us involved in a three front war.

"Only a fool fights a war on two fronts. It takes a madman to fight one on three."

We can either deal with Terrorism, which will take us the next 30 years, or we can deal with China. If we allow china to have 30 years, the Chinese Empire will be somewhat larger then it is now, and equipped with strategic weapons. If we deal with China, we let the terrorists win. Either way, we're in a bad situation. And this ignores the war on Iraq.

We shall see what happens in the next few months.


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lared135
New Member
Member # 792

 - posted      Profile for Lared135   Email Lared135   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
China is building up for conventional warfare, as well as unconventional. An article on Newsmax.Com is of particular interest in this discussion. The link to the full article is: China’s Military Planners Took Credit for 9/11 the story has the following quote:
quote:
Soon after the horrific attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, two high-ranking Chinese military planners took credit for the 9/11 attacks – and were even hailed as national heroes in China.
In fact, three years before 9/11, the Chinese colonels had proposed the attacks and cited Osama bin Laden by name in their book "Unrestricted Warfare.”

This I think you will agree will give most of us a sick feeling in the pit of our stomachs.

Joe


Posts: 3 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Crazy Eddie
Member
Member # 790

 - posted      Profile for Crazy Eddie     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
For those who are interested (I sure am) a Google search on "Unrestricted Warfare" provided me with these PDF excerpts. (Of course, I don't know what sort of excerpts they are, given that they are over 200 pages long!) If anyone has access to the English (or better yet, to the Chinese) copy of the book and could give us a rough indication of the accuracy/completeness of these excerpts, it would be greatly appreciated.

From what I have read, "took credit for the attacks" might be a bit too strong a phrase to describe the authors of this text. It seems more accurate that they felt that similar attacks would be effective, and thus felt that their theory was justified. To add to the "niceness" of the interpretation: Let's remember that all sorts of books attacking China are published in the US. Of course, I don't know how many of those are published by the War College...

Again, if anyone can uncover additional information, it would be greatly appreciated.

Regards,
Crazy Eddie


Posts: 24 | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
UBB Code™ Images not permitted.
Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Ornery.org Front Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.1