Ornery.org
  Front Page   |   About Ornery.org   |   World Watch   |   Guest Essays   |   Contact Us

The Ornery American Forum Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» The Ornery American Forum » General Comments » Bush Speaks About 9-11 (Page 2)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: Bush Speaks About 9-11
Colin JM0397
Member
Member # 916

 - posted      Profile for Colin JM0397   Email Colin JM0397   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You're quickly losing people, wakeup, if you had any listening to begin with. Some here might think you're on to something, but you're not helping your cause.

Stick to the facts.
Depending on what someone thinks happened – you’re saying Bush stood there at ground zero and blew the charges? Or flew the planes, or hired the terrorists? Or pushed “the button”? As if it would have mattered, 9 months in to his term, who was president at that point, anyway.

Regardless of who’s to blame and what “really” happened, an operation like that doesn’t materialize in less than 9 months (refer to Operation Bojinka). So was Bush planning to kill 3000 people when he was governor of Texas? Was Kerry in on the plan, too, in case he was president? What about Clinton? The planning had to have begun when he was president, so maybe it’s more like Clinton killed 1000, Kerry killed 1000, and Bush killed 1000? Sounds kinda silly, doesn’t it?

Perhaps whoever pulls the strings of those you think is responsible are the real responsible parties? Follow the money, follow the power – you can’t go wrong with that one.

[ October 04, 2006, 08:25 AM: Message edited by: jm0397 ]

Posts: 4738 | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
DonaldD
Member
Member # 1052

 - posted      Profile for DonaldD   Email DonaldD   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
DFTT jm - though I doubt it actually reads anything anyway...
Posts: 10751 | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Colin JM0397
Member
Member # 916

 - posted      Profile for Colin JM0397   Email Colin JM0397   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
??? - oh, don't feed...

But there's all this rotten ideas I have - what else to do with them but throw them under the bridge?

Considering the double posting on different threads, it apparently knows how to cut and paste.

Whee! Finger paintin' is next!

Posts: 4738 | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kenmeer livermaile
Member
Member # 2243

 - posted      Profile for kenmeer livermaile   Email kenmeer livermaile       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well, wakeup has a few neat soundbites. Like "think with your heads not your TVs".

That's a good 'un. I used to volunteer work with the retarded kids at my son's elementary schools. Retarded but they still came up with zingers. Out of the blue, you know.

Posts: 23297 | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
wakeup
Member
Member # 3081

 - posted      Profile for wakeup   Email wakeup       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
:eek:the gravitational potential energy of a skyscraper is nowhere near sufficient to destroy its own frame.
can you at least think about that
or has politics clouded your brain? [Exploding]
if you don't question it
you are part of the problem
not the solution
sorry. [DOH]

Posts: 45 | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kenmeer livermaile
Member
Member # 2243

 - posted      Profile for kenmeer livermaile   Email kenmeer livermaile       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Imagine '50s 'concrete poetry' with emoticons.
Posts: 23297 | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kenmeer livermaile
Member
Member # 2243

 - posted      Profile for kenmeer livermaile   Email kenmeer livermaile       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Let's hijack this thread:

article

Posts: 23297 | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
0Megabyte
Member
Member # 1217

 - posted      Profile for 0Megabyte   Email 0Megabyte       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hmm. Bush killed ONLY 3000 people? Ha.

Now, in reality, if you put absolute responsibility on him for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan... tjhat's a lot more than 3000.

Then again, does that change whether a war is just or not? Does that say whether the deaths were acceptable or not? That's a different question.

Posts: 2668 | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TommySama
Member
Member # 2780

 - posted      Profile for TommySama   Email TommySama       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You're forgetting. When he says people he means Americans. Non Americans aren't people to him.
Posts: 6396 | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
0Megabyte
Member
Member # 1217

 - posted      Profile for 0Megabyte   Email 0Megabyte       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Oh, yes. Of course. Thank you for the reminder, Tommy.
Posts: 2668 | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
wakeup
Member
Member # 3081

 - posted      Profile for wakeup   Email wakeup       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Fortunately the collapse of WTC Building 7 sheds new light on this subject.

Situated across Vesey Street and separated from the North Tower by Building 6,which did not itself collapse, even after sustaining extensive damage from fire and falling debris, WTC 7 showed no significant damage at all in photos taken just before it collapsed. There were a few internal fires, but they weren't large enough or hot enough to even break out the windows. Significantly, this 47-story monolith collapsed completely and uniformly straight down in less than seven seconds. Totally! The whole thing was sheared to the ground! The article states "NIST researchers now support the working hypothesis that WTC 7 was far more compromised by falling debris than the FEMA report indicated." Working hypothesis? Is that anything like a conspiracy theory? What evidence is offered to support this?

The unavoidable facts are that an airplane did not strike WTC
7, the discreet distance separating it from the North Tower protected it from falling debris, and there was absolutely no evidence of structural damage.

Conspicuous by its absence is any mention in the article about the stunningly short time span of the collapse. Quite possibly the under-seven-second swiftness was too much for even the "working hypothesis" to explain. Anyone with basic logic skills now knows that this was, in fact, a controlled demolition; and happily this reinforces suspicions about the towers too.

Posts: 45 | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
UBB Code™ Images not permitted.
Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Ornery.org Front Page

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.1