Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
ERIC's technical staff matches that data against data from all the other member states and Social Security death data. ERIC identifies voters who have moved, voters who have died, and voters with duplicate registrations within a state's database.
Does anyone legitimately believe that Trump DIDN'T massively exaggerate and overvalue his properties? Or is the argument that EVERYBODY does it, and its only anti-Trump bias that means he's being held accountable? I mean seriously, the man massively exaggerates EVERYTHING in his entire life, from his fortune, to his golf scores, to his mental prowess. The difference in this case is that he filed paperwork about it, and gained something from it.
Trump would not want all the real work that goes along with being Speaker. they would not let him ride his golf cart from his office to the House Chamber.
The people blaming this Congress for abusing the powers of their office for political reasons are the same ones that thought Trump pressuring a foreign leader to go after his political opponent was a perfect phone call. Fascinating.
To be fair, anyone in real estate would have been facing extreme swings on the balance sheet between 2007-2008 and even in the couple of years following. The lag in employment and other pricing could well have extended to a couple of years after the proximal incident of the GFC.
Quote from: msquared on November 12, 2022, 03:57:20 PM
In this case the crazies are not out for money. Jones was. The crazies go to jail for doing crazy things (like showing up and harrasing people, just like they think Jones told them to do).
That doesn't answer the issue of standing and whether Dick Cheney can sue a 9/11 truther for defamation, since obviously it implies he's a liar. Where is the line about suing for defamation when someone calls out a narrative as false?
The big problem though is that the arbiter of truth has very often been caught lying himself. Biden is known for being a constant habitual liar, both big and small. Even if you believe that Trump was a liar, surely there can be no doubt that Biden is one too.
If you want to be the Truth Arbiter, it doesn't help when everyone knows, even your supporters know whether they want to admit it or not, that you are a Liar, Big Time. So who watches the watchers? If the Biden administration gets to decide you can't see something because it's not true, who gets to decide that Biden also gets censored and canceled for his lies?
Politifact has lie after lie after lie from this guy.
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/list/?category=&ruling=false&speaker=joe-biden
Quote from: Wayward Son on November 02, 2022, 05:10:31 PM
Quote from: Crunch on November 02, 2022, 03:27:18 PM
Cloth masks stop viruses?
Cloth masks helped slow the spread of viruses. Ask the flu virus for the last couple of years.
Actually John Hopkins released research that said masks only concentrate the contaminates and increase the virulence.
Quote from: Wayward Son on November 02, 2022, 05:10:31 PM
Quote from: Crunch on November 02, 2022, 03:27:18 PM
Only 12 years, again, to save the planet?
I assume you are referring to global warming. Your ignorance is showing again. 12 years was the estimate that some scientists made of how long it would be before CO2 levels reached a point where it would start to seriously affect the worldwide climate and make it harder to survive. But that isn't a hard-and-fast line (unless we inadvertently passed a tipping point). It was just a good line-in-the-sand, a goal post where we can say that we don't want to be here.
Because you know what happens after we pass that point? Does everybody die? Of course not. We just now have to spend money to mitigate the effects of all that CO2, along with trying to reduce our emissions of it. Because after we reach that goal post, if we do nothing, it keeps getting worse. Droughts get worse; hurricanes get even more energy from the oceans; flooding gets worse; wildfires get worse. The ocean becomes even more acidic. There is no doubt all these things will happen, because we are already seeing them happen. Anyone who denies this simply is not living in the real world.
No. Name a real scientist who says Global Warming is a serious problem. Politicians say it - and bureaucrats who make money pretending. I'm not a specialist on climate, but know enough science to know our temporary warm period is a good thing, holding nack the humanity-killing ice-age we are currently in. There are zero models that have been back-checked to prove they work. They can't even predict temperatures of the past century.
When people don't vet what quote, when they don't ask questions and think about whether what they are saying is true, then they can see truth as lies, black as white, up as down. If you're not based in reality, eventually you'll go off a cliff. Which is fine, if you're the only one affected. But when you try to drag the rest of us with you... 
Well the Trump CFO pleads guilty and agrees to testify against the company.
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/top-trump-organization-executive-weissleberg-pleads-guilty-to-tax-fraud-144429978.html
15 counts of tax fraud.
I am sure Trump has never heard of this guy. He is just someone who works down the hall.
No way Trump plays second fiddle to any one. And my guess is if he runs and does not win the nomination, he will claim it was stolen by RINO's in the party and that he is the true nominee. A normal person with his money would then self fund a run as a third party, but Trump hates to use his own money.
I would love to see a three way primary between Trump and Desantis and either Pence or Cheney.
Why has no one mentioned the first proposed ticket, with Trump as President and DeSantis as VP - ready to become President for Trump's third term? Does anyone think a Trump-DeSantis ticket would fail?
Ron Johnson is weak in WI. We can beat him, but only with substantial financial support; he's got the backing of a couple local billionaires who actually are what William seems to think Soros is.
Is it far fetched to wonder if the timing of the warrant request could have taken into account that the other judge would be unavailable and this one would be the pinch hitter?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11107969/Trumps-attorney-wants-know-Judge-Reinhart-recused-Clinton-lawsuit.html
So that's a good question. Why did he recuse himself in the other case but figures he's unbiased enough to unleash this clown circus against Trump now? And the bigger question is would any judge they had taken this warrant request to have improved it? Or in other words, are there any judges would would have said no? I suppose we'll never know the answer to that for sure, but if the answer isn't that any and every judge would have approved it the same was this guy did, then that's a problem.
The PRA is moot, because Obama, Clinton, and others all flaunted it and were never held to follow it. The President is the final arbiter of what is classified and what is not. If the nuclear codes were declassified by the President, then they were declassified. No PRA can circumvent that.
Let me help you understand the legal nuances. The chain of custody makes admittance of the laptop a done fact.
Remember, the assertion here is that it is a "legal fact" that the data on the laptop was not hacked or altered in any way since it was obtained. There is an actual meaning of the phrase "legal fact," and I am asking if there has in fact been a finding of fact to this effect.
To the best of my knowledge, there has not.
