Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
NOBODY thinks masks provide perfect protection
So much for it being there, today, than it has been at any time since the previous ice age
Trump's team identified "2,423" voters that appeared to have voted without being registered (don't ask me how).
Is it the consensus among liberals here that this is in fact what he's trying to do? Or is there room in the narrative that his goal was to rile everyone up and where they went with that is more on them?
They need to bear in mind that not everyone who found themselves wandering around on Capital Hill did anything to warrant outright denouncement, much like those "useful idiots" I kept complaining about at the Portland riots where peaceful protesters would simply stand around in the street and watch as the rioters went about doing "their thing" at the Federal Buildings there.
The armed threat is relatively fleeting, and I can only suppose that they'll move on after their little stint. Some of these online harassment situations with doxxing and all the rest result in people being afraid to go home
... all the rest result in people being afraid to go home...
If the Republican Senate becomes fully obstructionist it will not win votes. To say it would is ridiculous.
but I'm not sure Seriati was implying that R voters are magically more virtuous or well-intentioned than D voters are.
No, not at all. Quite the contrary, I think Democratic voters are almost uniformly good people who mean well,good start. As a random voter who mostly goes (D), I appreciate that stance
I just think they overwhelming succomb to a relatively unexamined analysis of "good team" and "bad team." It's a virtue signalling to the extreme. They've literally tied their entire identity as a "good person" into voting to support Democrats.rather than examining the facts and simply coming to an honest conclusion you happen to disagree with.
They're absolutely sure Trump is a criminal, but they can't actual show any evidence that supports this (they have all manner of inuendo they believe, but when it comes to evidence is always some form of it's been proven).Immoral? yes. Unethical? Absolutely. Illegal? Apparently not. And the proof is in his own books, where he brags about it. He calls it being a good businessman.
They're absolutely sure that somehow Trump is unique in the history of the world is his obvious evilness and rudeness, despite that they watched him for years on tv and never noticed it,Not even close to unique. But 'not the worst' is hardly an endorsement. And I did notice it from his time on TV and even earlier. But I'M not the one who thought he would make a good president.
despite that the politicians they admire took money for him and valued him socially, and despite the very real fact that prominent Democrat politicians are every bit as nasty in what they say about Trump and even about Republicans generally, and media and entertainment talking heads are even worse.Did I mention how poorly you are coming across when you assume that Democratic voters are simply pulling the (D) lever without thinking about issues or character? Or that I admire the politician some other state elected?
They believe every rumor they hear about him and repeat it.like all of stories about the microchips in the vaccines, or the pedophiles operating out of the back rooms of pizza parlors?
They honestly believe that hiding criminal activity about Biden is a good thing to do,Nope. And again you are supposedly talking about the average voter here. So you think that roughly half the population is so morally bankrupt that we would do anything to get a Democrat - any Democrat - into office. Rather than looking at the shreds of evidence which have been released so far and saying 'man I wish whoever is sitting on the rest would release it so we could see what is actually going on'.
and that violating the Constitution to get dirt on Trump is totally okay (though its criminal if Trump gets dirt on his opponent).Nope again. However, reasonable people CAN look at the same evidence and come to differing conclusions.
So. About California and a few other Democratic strongholds with large populations of illegal immigrants that they want to have counted towards their population for the purpose of allocating seats in the House of Representatives even though those persons are unable to vote?
The first is unethical, but the second is a much bigger deal, worst case scenario treason. Hardly the same.
Beyond that, you would elect an individual who is beholden to, and blackmailable by, China?
The Right to Privacy never appears in the ConstitutionMy search function is acting up - so excuse the paraphrase, but the Constitution has a line in the part separating states rights and personal rights saying 'the fact that a right is not explicitly written here doesn't mean it doesn't exist'
Within the next few months the team was shot down by Stinger Missiles with serial numbers from the US stockpile.
But I see no reason for a Trump supporter in rural Pennsylvania...(to be shy about it)
You are hiding behind an old CDC bulletin in order to justify hypocrisy. They are publicly available, walk the talk.
