Why would anyone bother to try to rig an election for Biden in Alabama?
Mail in voter fraud is a gift that gives over multiple election cycles. Tipping a single nursing home worker in every district has a huge cumulative impact. This year with increased mail in voting, the opportunity set was just much larger.
I don't think anyone set up a brand new mail in voter fraud program in Alabama to specifically help Biden in this election. I think that existing manipulation systems were used and magnified by the increased opportunity.
Who is going to commit a felony for no reason? Alabama wasn't in play, it doesn't have enough electors to swing anything.
It isn't for no reason, once you start the cycle stopping it raises suspicion. If a nursing home has a 90% turnout in past elections but this one only had a 25% turnout, and then it's back to 90% it's a red flag.
Why don't you read something on it? There are accounts out there from people who describe actually doing it.
Most of the of the complaints you guys raise are nonsensical objections, kind of like complaining that water isn't wet cause you don't get wet when you touch the water on your tv screen.
I mentioned mail in fraud in Alabama because it's the only fraud that can still be easily run there with a low chance of getting caught. Fraud involving voting machines takes a much higher sophistication and level of coordination. Fraud at voting centers generates anomalies that can be tracked though "proving" it even with videos and affadavits is apparently not possible.
You just need to realize that Trump drove turnout for both sides.
Certainly possible, though unusual enough for the reasons cited above to warrant investigation.
If Democrats were rigging the process everywhere, which you must think if you believe they were bothering with Alabama then shouldn't the Trump team been able to catch them somewhere?
People get caught every single election cycle. If that was all you are "looking" for (you're not really looking at all though), it'd be done.
Catching them somewhere is different from tying them into some kind of coordinated response or to numbers "large enough" to make a difference. There may not even be a "coordinated" effort. How do you show a "conspiracy" if none exists but instead tens of thousands of people of limited morals come to the same conclusion about the ease of cheating in their own interests and then do so?
Don't believe it happens? Has there EVER been even a local election where someone didn't steal signs of the candidate they oppose? Put up signs in violation of election rules? Heck, I'm willing to bet you know someone personally that's cheated in an election and that you may know you know.
Do you suspect fraud in small rural districts?
Sure, as I mentioned before, they don't provide the scale for the truly large operations. Everything I said about 10's of thousands of bad actors would need to be hundreds of thousands (or more) to have the same effect through small districts.
They went really heavily to Trump.
I guaranty that someone somewhere also cast a fraudulent vote for Trump.
Districts with 50,000 voters get a lot less scrutiny than the big metro areas. A lot easier to cheat in without as many people looking over your shoulder.
Please provide evidence to support this. I flat out say it is false, and I don't think you can demonstrate it. Why don't you take a look and see if you can.
All the local officials are Republicans.
Why don't you point out the district where this is the case? The number of districts that are uniformly Democrat is far higher, and many of the districts are not just "local official" controlled by the Democrats they have a nearly complete lack of any Republican voters.
In Philly, for example, that means they don't even have any opportunity for legal Republican poll watchers as the law there requires poll watchers be a voter in the district. I think I pointed out above something like a quarter of the districts in Philly had a only hand full of registered Republicans. Can you find a significant number of districts where the reverse is true? Bet you can't find enough to match the number of voters in those Philly districts. Maybe you'll find a couple in the middle of nowhere with a hundred registered voters all related to each other. But it doesn't remotely compare to nearly a quarter of the districts in Philly being so one sided as to be virtually impossible to have Republican oversight, and you know it doesn't.
Do you understand every argument you have put forward works just as well to support Trump committing fraud somewhere?
I even pointed out the possibility several times (and why it was less likely).
I'm disappointed in the reading comprehension on this thread and even more disappointed in the wilful blindness. You don't have to believe this election was stolen to get educated on this topic. It doesn't make you a bad Democrat to actually care about voter fraud.