You think an inartful metaphor is in any way equivalent to any of those issues raised concerning Taylor Greene? Really? Even if you think he meant the island would literally tip over, that would just mean he was stupid. Is that really equivalent to having supported the killing of her current coworkers?
Okay.
"The penalty for treason is death." (true)
"Nancy Pelosi is guilty of Treason." (open to interpretation, she hasn't been convicted by judge or jury though)
"Nancy Pelosi should be hung [for treason]." (opinion) (I don't think Hanging is allowed anymore due to SCotUS rulings, but anyhow...)
At what point do those three statements become "Somebody should abduct Nancy Pelosi and hang her" in your world? That is not what she's said.
Of but she also tweeted "A bullet would be faster" (in regards to Pelosi) where she is disputing that she was the one who posted that.
Even if she did type it out herself, you get into 1st Amendment issues, and the matter of that still falls short of her saying "Someone should go out and assassinate Nancy Pelosi."
That one can easily be explained away as "figurative speech" rather than instructive and inciting, and also a matter of opinion(which is also factually correct, rather gauche, but correct).
If holding an opinion about something which views an illegal action in a favorable way is a crime, everyone is likely to be in deep trouble. Now some opinions are better left unsaid, but that's obviously not the world she wants to live in, so let the consequences begin. But don't go running around requiring everyone else to virtue signal by becoming part of the lynch mob you want to create to go after her.
This is an issue between her and the other members of Congress, as well as between her, and the constituents of her district. Where honestly, the opinion of Congress takes a back seat to her constituents in Colorado. If they support her, then that is the representation they want in Congress, the rest of us will have to live with it.