When it comes down to who looks and speaks like a president, Hillary wins hands down. Here she is, beaming in a moment of triumph:
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-35820350 check the vid if you can do the data
contrast her actual demeanor to what the circle of idiot-newsboys says:
Faux News' Brit Hume claims she's "shouting angrily." Uh no, Brit, she's smiling, and speaking exuberantly (albeit hoarsely)
Howard Kurtz: repeats the shouting claim, and suggests "a more conversational tone" might be more appropriate. I guess he likes his women seated in the sun room with a cup of tea in their hands, pinky pointed upwards. Howard, this is a victory rally in front of a cheering crowd.
Politico's Glenn Thrush repeats the "shouting" claim, contrasting it to what he claims was her topic of "love and kindness." Except Hillary wasn't talking about love and kindness. She was delivering the message that she won the night, looks poised to win the primary, and expects to win the election as well. Nothing in the video says anything about "love and kindness."
And MSNBC's Joe Scarboro reminds Hillary to "smile." Are you blind, Joe? She's smiling the whole time.
Take home? These male newsies seem incapable of looking at a woman's face, or listening to what she's saying. I think they must just look at her tits and here [wah wah wah] like the adults in a Charlie brown cartoon. Nothing but the tone of her voice.
With that sort of crap out there, I can appreciate why Hillary's basically written off nonblack males, like Romney's 47%. She must figure that we're all sexist brutes and won't hear what she's saying. And her "vote for me because you're female, and vote for me because you're black or Hispanic" seems to work for her, better than Romney's "vote for me because you're privileged." I guess Hillary doesn't talk to voters as if we were grown ups, because the popularity of Brit Hume, Joe Scarboro, et al, strongly suggests that we're not.