Author Topic: Alex Jones, scumbag  (Read 8469 times)

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Alex Jones, scumbag
« on: April 08, 2022, 12:41:17 PM »
Now that Info Wars guy Alex Jones is finally being held to account for all of his defamation of the Sandy Hook families, he is trying to hide his assets.

What a despicable person

https://www.yahoo.com/news/alex-jones-accused-jaw-dropping-160251301.html

yossarian22c

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2022, 03:33:06 PM »
Alex Jones complete scumbag.

Wondering how people say and do things like that and are just now getting punished financially.

Meanwhile, Phil Mickelson says the following about a Saudi golf league and withdraws from public life?

Quote
"They're scary motherf****** to get involved with," Mickelson said in the interview posted on the golf website Fire Pit Collective.

"We know they killed [Washington Post reporter and U.S. resident Jamal] Khashoggi and have a horrible record on human rights. They execute people over there for being gay. Knowing all of this, why would I even consider it?"

Saudi Arabia killed Khashoggi and they have a horrible human rights record.

I'm not sure why this has sparked outrage, apologies, and withdrawing from golf tournaments, including the Masters.

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2022, 09:03:59 AM »
Now Infowars has filed for Bankruptcy.  I hope the judge denies this.

Wayward Son

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2022, 11:45:40 AM »
You didn't mention why InfoWars had to file for bankruptcy, msquared.

Quote
Jones claimed the shooting, in which 20 children and six school employees were shot dead at the school in Newtown, Connecticut, was fabricated by gun-control advocates and mainstream media.

Sandy Hook families in late March rejected Jones' offer to settle their defamation lawsuit and reopened the case. Jones had offered to pay $120,000 to each of the 13 plaintiffs to settle the case.

Each of the plaintiffs turned down the settlement offer in court documents, saying, "The so-called offer is a transparent and desperate attempt by Alex Jones to escape a public reckoning under oath with his deceitful, profit-driven campaign against the plaintiffs and the memory of their loved ones lost at Sandy Hook."

None the parents of the slain children would take his money after he used their dead children for propaganda purposes.  Righteous wrath at it's finest.

yossarian22c

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2022, 02:15:21 PM »
Now Infowars has filed for Bankruptcy.  I hope the judge denies this.

Nothing like paying millions of dollars to your shell company to try to avoid any liability.

yossarian22c

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #5 on: April 18, 2022, 03:21:06 PM »
Now Infowars has filed for Bankruptcy.  I hope the judge denies this.

Probably isn't going to help his case that he has been so uncooperative that the judges have issued summary judgements against him.

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #6 on: April 18, 2022, 05:05:07 PM »
Maybe they will be able to collect some of the money.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/alex-jones-hit-1-million-202611275.html

I wonder how he will try and spin this as someone trying to suppress his free speech. I guess he did not read the part about where you were not able to defame people and lie about them, especially to make money off of it.

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2022, 07:44:27 AM »
Well it looks like Alex Jones is not going to get off that easy.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/sandy-hook-families-dismissed-infowars-185545260.html

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #8 on: June 02, 2022, 07:14:43 PM »
And Alex Jones has dismissed his bankruptcy claims.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/alex-jones-infowars-agrees-dismiss-221752097.html



msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #11 on: August 03, 2022, 01:55:45 PM »

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #12 on: August 03, 2022, 05:33:25 PM »
Alex Jones has been caught committing perjury. He has lied under oath about having Sandy Hook text messages on his phone. His own lawyer accidently sent the full text history to the lawyers of the plaintiffs.


LetterRip

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #13 on: August 04, 2022, 08:50:34 AM »
I'm not sure how the lawyer could 'accidentally' send them.

I'd think the lawyer was required to turn them over as part of discovery?

Also isn't the lawyer required to tell the court when their client has committed perjury if they are aware of the fact that their client has done so?

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #14 on: August 04, 2022, 08:53:40 AM »
yeah I think the lawyer is going to be in trouble. Maybe he realizes that his client will not have any money to pay, since he has already been found guilty and this is just the penalty phase. I wonder how much of a retainer he got.

I assume Jones can sue the lawyer for malpractice?  He might get disbarred.  Can you appeal a awarded amount based on malpractice?

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #15 on: August 04, 2022, 10:36:13 AM »
Hearing Alex complain about how he has been found guilty and the judge explaining to him that this is a civil trial and he has been found liable, which is a very different thing, almost makes me think Alex is not as smart as he thinks he is.  And he was found liable due to his resistance to doing anything in the trial other than obstruct.

He can not believe that someone is finally holding him accountable for all of his lies.

yossarian22c

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #16 on: August 04, 2022, 11:03:10 AM »
Hearing Alex complain about how he has been found guilty and the judge explaining to him that this is a civil trial and he has been found liable, which is a very different thing, almost makes me think Alex is not as smart as he thinks he is.  And he was found liable due to his resistance to doing anything in the trial other than obstruct.

He can not believe that someone is finally holding him accountable for all of his lies.

Not all of his lies. Just for one very specific, disgusting one, and his sovereign citizen attitude towards the civil trials that led to default judgements of liability against him. The proceedings now are just to decide how much he owes. We'll see how much he pissed off the judge with committing perjury. That is something that could be referred to a criminal court and he could be found guilty.

NobleHunter

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #17 on: August 04, 2022, 01:16:51 PM »
yeah I think the lawyer is going to be in trouble. Maybe he realizes that his client will not have any money to pay, since he has already been found guilty and this is just the penalty phase. I wonder how much of a retainer he got.

I assume Jones can sue the lawyer for malpractice?  He might get disbarred.  Can you appeal a awarded amount based on malpractice?

Jones can sue his lawyer but I don't think an appeal is possible. The malpractice is even worse because the lawyer had 10 days to remedy the mistake which they failed to do. Since they didn't tell the other side to send the erroneously provided information back it's open season on it. The Jan 6th committee has already expressed an interest in Jones' communications.

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #18 on: August 04, 2022, 01:50:40 PM »
I mean I guess I understand why Trump likes Jones.  I mean Jones is another oath breaker.

Mynnion

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #19 on: August 04, 2022, 02:13:31 PM »
I think if Jones is not charged with perjury it will look bad.  This case is too public to let him off.  Couldn't happen to a more deserving individual.

Wayward Son

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #20 on: August 04, 2022, 03:44:57 PM »
Quote
The Jan 6th committee has already expressed an interest in Jones' communications.

I wonder if one of the attorneys submitted the emails as evidence?  Wouldn't that make it part of the trial, which is "public" information?  Which would mean that the January 6th Committee would only have to file a request to the court to get them, right? :D

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #21 on: August 04, 2022, 03:52:20 PM »
If this is malpractice  i wonder if they can be used? The plaintiff's lawyer says he notified Jones's attorney about the info he was sent to see if any of it was protected under privilege and Jones's attorney seems to not have given any reply for 12 days ( I assume that means something in the legal field about the evidence). Jones might be able to argue that since it was given under the idea of malpractice it should not be public evidence.

 

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #22 on: August 04, 2022, 07:27:10 PM »
Well the jury came back with 4.1 million in compensatory damages. Friday they get to determine punitive damages.

Wayward Son

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #23 on: August 05, 2022, 11:01:35 AM »
Those emails are a gift that keep on giving.

As summarized at Electoral-vote.com in their This Week in Schadenfreude section, there are a few other things those emails may have revealed.

First, some of the things we already know:

Quote
Jones turned the complete contents of his cell phone over to his defense team. And the defense team turned them over to the plaintiffs... without redacting or withholding any of them. The plaintiffs know all. And once the gaffe was revealed, Judge Maya Guerra Gamble refused to declare a mistrial or to seal the contents of the phone. We are assuming that she ruled on the merits, but it surely didn't help Jones' case that he's been going on air and slamming her as an idiot while the hearings are still underway. In any case, Gamble said there might have been time for such considerations if Jones hadn't disrespected the trial process and dragged his feet on discovery, but now he must reap what he sowed. Reading between the lines, it sure looks like the plaintiffs aren't the only ones in the courtroom who hate Jones. The judge and his own attorneys apparently hate him, as well.

And it still gets better. Everyone who's been looking at Jones, and hitting a brick wall, now wants a copy of the treasure trove. That includes the Dept. of Justice and the 1/6 Committee. And the plaintiffs' attorney is delighted to send it to them. He specifically told the judge he would do so unless she put a stop to it. She issued no such order.
(Emphasis mine.)

So it looks like the emails may have already been distributed, regardless of any possible lawsuits about attorney incompetence. :)

And then there is the other stuff...

Quote
There appear to be other... goodies on the phone that could prove embarrassing or incriminating. For example, there have been allusions during the current proceedings to "intimate messages" between Jones and Roger Stone. Who knows what exactly that means, but we could totally see them being gay for each other. In a much more criminal direction, a filing in one of the other Sandy Hook cases—those plaintiffs' lawyers already got their USB sticks with all the text messages—asserts that child porn has been found on the phone.

And who knows what else may be in those emails?  ;D

In case you are interested, the site has links in each paragraph to the article each was based on.

rightleft22

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #24 on: August 05, 2022, 12:52:16 PM »
So is this Alex Jones a psychopath, sociopath, deranged, narcissist,  evil, a con man... a person with a agenda to which the ends justify the means.
I personal never believed that he believed anything he said and somewhere in that lie lost himself

Wayward Son

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #25 on: August 05, 2022, 06:07:55 PM »
I don't think the jury likes Alex Jones, either.

$45.2 million in punitive damages.

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #26 on: August 11, 2022, 10:23:26 AM »
Alex Jones sent Roger Stone nude pictures of his wife with out her knowledge or consent. So much for the morality of either of these men.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/alex-jones-wife-said-she-162430924.html

yossarian22c

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #27 on: August 11, 2022, 12:18:59 PM »
I don't think the jury likes Alex Jones, either.

$45.2 million in punitive damages.

Or the opposing council. He seems really happy to share as much of Jones's info with the Jan 6th committee, law enforcement, or other people suing Jones as the judge will allow. And the judge hates Jones and doesn't seem to be in any mood to restrict his ability to distribute the material to anyone else.

NobleHunter

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #28 on: August 11, 2022, 12:32:43 PM »
Too bad the damages are capped.

TheDrake

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #29 on: September 23, 2022, 02:50:59 PM »
Quite a meltdown.

"Just like all the Iraqis you liberals kill and love. You're unbelievable. You switch emotions on and off when you want."

two minute video, worth watching unless you are a Jones supporter

Ouija Nightmare

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #30 on: September 26, 2022, 02:30:51 PM »
Quite a meltdown.

"Just like all the Iraqis you liberals kill and love. You're unbelievable. You switch emotions on and off when you want."

two minute video, worth watching unless you are a Jones supporter


Sweet!

They got him to pop into true character in the courtroom!

DJQuag

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #31 on: September 26, 2022, 04:37:29 PM »
Jesus, if this is an actual unbiased moderate and neutral jury, this guy is screwed.

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #32 on: September 26, 2022, 04:50:40 PM »
The thing is he has already been found responsible.  This is just the penalty phase.

He, and his lawyers, did not comply with the discovery portion on the trial, so it was basically a default judgement against him. He lost that part of the suite by not supplying any information to the plaintiffs. So it was basically a summary judgement.

And now he is complaining about it. That is why he is not able to make certain claims or statements when testifying.

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #33 on: October 12, 2022, 04:29:25 PM »
Well the second jury is back.

$965 million.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/alex-jones-ct-jury-sandy-hook-defamation-trial-200018013.html

They will never get anywhere near that much, but the jury was, I think, making a point.

DJQuag

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #34 on: October 12, 2022, 04:35:56 PM »
Crunch, Cherry, Seriati?

Anyone want to defend this guy? Seems like he's on your side

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #35 on: November 10, 2022, 01:51:02 PM »

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #36 on: November 10, 2022, 02:02:09 PM »
And almost another half a billion in punitive damages on top of the almost 1 billion already awarded.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/alex-jones-ordered-pay-473m-184657882.html

cherrypoptart

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #37 on: November 10, 2022, 06:35:50 PM »
It seems like a bad idea to defend this guy because if you do then you could get sued for a gazillion dollars too and you'll lose too.

Kanye West is also getting sued for saying that he thought (past tense as he changed his tune after the 250 million dollar lawsuit) that drugs killed George Floyd.

Nowadays it seems like Buzz Aldrin could just sue the guy who accused him of not landing on the moon (and therefore lying about it) instead of punching him in the mouth. And with a jury like this Buzz would win.

If someone falsely accuses you of rape and you say no I didn't do that then you get sued for denying the charges (which means you're calling her a liar) and even being one of the top defense lawyers in the country won't protect you. Then you vigorously defend yourself and she says oh maybe I made a mistake never mind and after your reputation is dragged through the mud and you've lost a fortune in attorney's fees and probably public relations management company fees she walks away scot-free no harm no foul no consequences.

For the record I didn't think that any of the mass shootings were false flag operations but that doesn't necessarily mean that false flag operations don't exist. Now you aren't even allowed to speculate about them or a jury will grant damages against you of more money than even exists in the world. Where does it end? If you say the The Reichstag Fire was a false flag operation should neo-Nazi's be able to sue you? What about 9-11 victims and their families if you say that was an inside job or never happened at all? Sure, that'd be ridiculous but should it be for all intents and purposes illegal? If a court can find you liable and you get zillions of dollars judgments against you then it may as well be.

Wayward Son

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #38 on: November 10, 2022, 06:59:32 PM »
Give it up, Cherry.  That's is a false equivalence if I've ever heard one.

He didn't just mention casually that those children weren't really killed.  He repeated it, day after day, even after he knew it wasn't true.  And his lies made the lives of the parents hell, with his followers accusing them, yelling at them and threatening them.  And still Alex didn't back off, even after he knew it wasn't true.

You're objections remind me of someone who says we shouldn't prosecute a rapist who beat and stabbed his victim because anyone who has sex could then be accused.  ::)

If he has the right to lie like that and make people's lives miserable just because their children were murdered, why have liable laws at all?  Why not let anyone say anything about anyone?  Because you're arguing that no one should be responsible for what they say, regardless of the consequences of them saying it. 

What ever happened to Conservative who believed in personal responsibility?  ::)

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #39 on: November 10, 2022, 07:19:33 PM »
And no one stopped him from saying anything. In fact he can still say it. But he must take reasonability for the pain he causes with his lies, especially ones he directs at private citizens.

The fact that he also made millions off his lies also hurt him.  His money making schemes were so tied up in the lies he could not stop.

cherrypoptart

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #40 on: November 10, 2022, 10:16:50 PM »
As a great philosopher once put it:

George Costanza : "Jerry, just remember. It's not a lie if *you* believe it."

How exactly do you prove that someone doesn't believe something you think is crazy? Or just plain wrong? How do you prove they don't believe their own opinion?

How do you prove Kanye didn't believe the drugs killed George Floyd?

How do you prove someone doesn't believe the moon landing was faked? That 9-11 didn't happen or if it did it was an inside job? Or that the Earth isn't flat? Or that there wasn't massive undetectable election fraud?

A woman was sentenced by a judge to life in jury duty because he didn't believe the opinion she expressed was really her opinion.

https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/brooklyn-judge-orders-woman-to-serve-jury-duty-for-life/

https://woldcnews.com/809021/judge-gives-woman-jury-duty-for-life-for-racist-answers/

https://abcnews.go.com/US/york-juror-offends-court-racist-remarks/story?id=13309260

April 7, 2011 -- A federal judge in Brooklyn became infuriated with a potential juror this week after she made racist comments about blacks and Latinos and called New York City police lazy, in what some in the courtroom viewed as an attempt to evade jury duty. Instead, the judge ordered her to keep coming to court indefinitely.

However, he later relented, releasing the woman after a day of duty in which she sat alone in a holding tank. He allowed her to sneak out the back door to avoid the media.

The potential juror's responses on the jury questionnaire raised the ire of U.S. District Judge Nicholas Garaufis.

After reading through her questionnaire and seeing the disparaging remarks, Garaufis told the woman, "This is an outrage, and so are you!"

The identity of Juror No. 799 has not been released, but public court records revealed that she is in her 20s, lives in Brooklyn, is a naturalized U.S. citizen of Asian descent who works for a large garment production company.

The woman has been dismissed from the death penalty trial of alleged mob boss Vincent "Vinny Gorgeous" Basciano, but officials initially said she could serve as a juror in another trial.

"I have 18 years on the job and I've seen every excuse in the book," said Anthony Frisolone, the court reporter who took transcriptions of the proceedings. "It's deplorable that people try this stuff. I find it offensive."

It's unclear whether Juror No. 799 made the statements in her questionnaire because she was trying to duck jury duty or if she really had such beliefs. Garaufis' law clerk, John Fitzpatrick, said the judge was unable to comment on the issue or elaborate on how long the juror might be required to stay on jury duty.

A court transcript revealed the woman's dislike for the NYPD and for blacks, Latinos and Haitians.

"Now, you said your view about the police department. You don't seem to like them, either," Garaufis asked the juror.

"Yes," the juror said. "They abuse the system. ... I've seen it on the streets and I've seen them with traffic and--"

"And they're lazy?" Garaufis asked.

"I think so," the juror said.

Balky Juror Ordered to Do Indefinite Jury Duty
Frisolone explained that jurors selected for anonymous juries are required to answer a long questionnaire of more than 50 pages. Based on their answers, attorneys for the prosecution and defense try to weed out prejudicial jurors.

"You don't know," Frisolone said of whether the woman was trying to get off of jury duty. "The judge has seen enough questionnaires in his time that he can probably tell."

Jurors are asked to list three people they least admire. Juror No. 799 wrote "African-Americans, Hispanics and Haitians."

Garaufis questioned her about it.

"You were asked the three people you least admire," he said, "not half of the population of New York City. Did you understand that?"

"Yes," the juror said.

"So why did you put down that you least admired African-Americans, Hispanics, and Haitians?" Garaufis asked.

"Because every time when there's a news it's always about them and they always commit crimes," the juror said.

He then asked her about another part of her questionnaire in which she said a relative of hers had been a member of the Chinese Ghost Shadows gang and had been serving time in prison for murder.

"Why didn't you put Asians down also?" the judge asked about the groups she least admired.

Her reply: "Maybe I should have."









cherrypoptart

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #41 on: November 11, 2022, 07:35:42 AM »
To put it another way, these types of decisions say one of two things either of which is concerning.

We don't believe that you actually believe what you say you believe so you are lying when you say you believe it.

We believe what you say you believe isn't true so if you do believe it you aren't allowed to say that's what you believe.

And of course the real implied kicker, the true purpose behind it all, is we don't believe that people should believe what you say you believe so we will punish you harshly for saying it and spreading your unacceptable idea contagion and hopefully stop others both from believing that idea but certainly at least stop them from spreading it.

It starts with something like this that the vast majority encourage and then it proceeds to you can't say that someone died because of drugs when we say the police murdered him (Kanye),  you can't say that you didn't rape me even if I falsely say you did (Alan Dershowitz), you can't say that the vaccine is more dangerous than the virus, you can't say I didn't land on the moon, and it just goes down the slippery slope from there.

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #42 on: November 11, 2022, 07:54:42 AM »
Again it is when he uses his belief to make money and put other people in danger.

cherrypoptart

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #43 on: November 11, 2022, 09:32:04 AM »
So if that's the case how does it explain how Kanye West is getting sued for $250 million for saying he thought drugs killed George Floyd?

He didn't say that for money. He didn't put anyone in danger. If anything he's losing money because he expressed his opinion and he's helping raise awareness about the dangers of drugs especially fentanyl.

And losing money in the marketplace is fine, but having a court and the government bring the full weight of the law against you is something else.

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #44 on: November 11, 2022, 09:41:55 AM »
Has he lost the suit yet? Remember, any one can sue any one for any reason.  The plaintiffs may get refused in court. They may lose on the merits.

Jones lost by default because he did not follow the rules of discovery.  His case was never decided by a jury since he screwed around with the court and was found liable by default. I wonder why he did not want the discovery process for his companies? What was he trying to hide?

Jones could have had an actual trial, but he decided not to participate.

My guess is the Floyd families will not win their case.  Ye has not made any money off of his rantings.

NobleHunter

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #45 on: November 11, 2022, 10:36:28 AM »
If you're really worried about it, cherry, you can look up the jurisprudence on libel and/or slander. I don't think any of your questions are particularly novel and US law has had a fun time getting defamation to fit with the First Amendment. My impression from assorted anecdotes is that if you lose a defamation suit in the US, you've probably done something pretty egregious. This is a contrast to the UK which is weighted more towards the plaintiff.

I don't know how the question of belief affects a suit, though I think being able to demonstrate having solid grounds to believe something would be an effective defence. In Jones' case, he's actually argued that he doesn't believe what he said so that's not available to him.

If the suit against Kanye is spurious then one would expect he'd get fees awarded.

I don't find "how does it affect the richest people in the country?" to necessarily be a good way to evaluate the quality of a law. It's already difficult, if not impossible, to inflict sufficient damage on bad actors due tort reform to keep them from flagrantly breaking the law. I don't think we should make it harder out of misplaced empathy for the ultra rich.

cherrypoptart

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #46 on: November 11, 2022, 12:06:08 PM »
I admit to just checking out the headlines and what's been written here.

The celebration though seems to be because of the assumption that it's illegal, and rightfully so, to say something that might hurt someone's feelings.

Now if he purposefully sent people out there to harass them that would be something else but his lawyer says he didn't do that. Also, if he doesn't believe that it's a false flag operation but just had people on his show who believed that, that gets back to the same issue of the First Amendment. Not only can you not say something offensive but you can't even have a public conversation with anyone else who might say it.

The case looks ripe for appeal though so we'll see what happens but the public delight at the First Amendment's evisceration is concerning.

NobleHunter

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #47 on: November 11, 2022, 12:11:59 PM »
It's not the evisceration of the First to hold that a person can't say untrue things that harm other people without being held to account for it. Again, you should stop being alarmist and at least familiarize yourself with how defamation law works in the US, if not these cases in particular.

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #48 on: November 11, 2022, 12:15:16 PM »
The First Amendment is not being eviscerated.  It took the plaintiffs years to get to this point and Jones had every chance to defend himself in court. He did not.

The First Amendment is for the Government. This is a civil trial

Jones can keep spouting off his lies all he wants. No one is stopping him.  It is just that there will be a cost  Especially now that he has admitted that it was not a hoax.

How much investigation did Jones do to see if Sandy Hook actually happened?  He used this as a tool to make money. He did not care about the truth.

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Alex Jones, scumbag
« Reply #49 on: November 11, 2022, 12:16:54 PM »
And I doubt there can be an appeal, at least on liability, since the case was decided by default.  He may be able to appeal the amounts awarded, but I think due to his non compliance with the discovery portion of the trial, he has no room to appeal.  As far as I know he has not appealed anything yet, in either case, and he has had plenty of time.