Author Topic: The Trump Papers  (Read 19318 times)

Wayward Son

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #300 on: January 30, 2023, 03:52:55 PM »
Just an interesting tidbit which will undoubtedly be brought up in regards to Trumps' papers: James Comey testified that, out of the 33,000 emails that were examined from Hillary Clinton, only one had any kind of classified marking, and even an expert in classification would not have immediately recognized it.

So let's leave Hillary out if this conversation, eh? :)

Tom

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #301 on: January 30, 2023, 04:19:03 PM »
Yeah, the whole "server full of classified email" thing became a complete non-issue to me a couple years back when it was revealed that none of the emails on her server actually had classified tags in the headers. That was what had always bothered me, because for nearly 20 years it's been trivial to automatically handle classified email properly based on header content; you have to make deliberate choices as a systems administrator to NOT do so, so I couldn't for the life of me figure out why that wasn't the case.

It turns out that pretty much no one in the government was properly sending classified email, despite having the ability to do so for over a decade, so none of the email arriving was being tagged as classified (whether it should have been or not). There WERE systems in place to properly handle classified email that was correctly tagged, but apparently the only identifiers being sent were the sort of identifiers that, at that time, were in use on the internal text of paper copies and Word documents. This is shameful and infuriating, because I take email security very seriously, but it's not Clinton's fault (and it's not the fault of her server admin, either). And that's even assuming that her server administrator didn't have logic in place to deliberately block any email that WAS properly classified from arriving at the server -- which, honestly, is something that I would consider doing in that scenario and which would also produce the same result seen here. Since we don't have insight into how many emails should have been tagged as classified that weren't, but we do know that no emails tagged as classified were improperly stored, this whole thing is, as pundits would say, a "nothingburger."

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #302 on: January 30, 2023, 04:25:09 PM »
But Hillary!!!!!!  But Benghazi!!!!!!!!!!!  But Hunter!!!!!!!!!!!!! But his Birth Certificate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Fenring

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #303 on: January 30, 2023, 05:47:08 PM »
I don't want to deep dive into Comey's claims either, but iirc the claim made at the time was that standing instructions were to remove classified markings and to send them via her email. I assume she wanted them all in one place for easy access, similar reason to not wanting to use multiple portable devices and so having everything on one phone. Comey's remarks make no sense as-is since at the time we had heard from multiple people working with/for Hillary who remarked that they had warned her over and over not to do things that way, and that she'd given them instructions to do it and to make it work. Why would they warn Hillary those documents weren't supposed to go to her email if in fact none of them were classified anyhow? Again I'm not doing due diligence research, just pointing out that on the face of it Comey's remarks come across as perhaps technically true but misleading, much like the remarks he released about Hillary during the actual election.

Tom

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #304 on: January 30, 2023, 06:25:14 PM »
The problem that I have with that narrative -- which is the one I believed originally, too -- is that investigators never actually managed to produce an email that was improperly declassified, and I have to assume that wasn't for lack of trying.

Fenring

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #305 on: January 30, 2023, 06:44:13 PM »
The problem that I have with that narrative -- which is the one I believed originally, too -- is that investigators never actually managed to produce an email that was improperly declassified, and I have to assume that wasn't for lack of trying.

I have plenty of faith in regulatory incompetence, from everything I've heard about about Wall Street and (in particular) the great financial crisis. And likewise great faith in incompetence in investigation, from both that and other stories such as the Challenger incident and others. People are really just not good at actually looking at details, especially when it's not immediately intuitive how to do it. So you find a document with no head, and from the text are supposed to glean not only whether it may be important, but where it originated from, where an original might be filed, and to actually find it and verify its header? And that's one file at a time, there's no way to scale this process.

TheDrake

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #306 on: January 30, 2023, 06:51:50 PM »
You don't think there's a way to speed up that process? What do you think there's some guy with a jewelers loop and a glove? These are electronic records examined by a government with a data center the size of Rhode island in the middle of the Utah desert. You think they couldn't brute force match her documents with all known classified documents, including fragments? "No way to scale that process" is where you want to hang your hat?

Fenring

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #307 on: January 30, 2023, 06:59:16 PM »
"No way to scale that process" is where you want to hang your hat?

I don't actually know what the answer is, or whether Comey's statement is accurate. I was only pointing out that it doesn't make sense given what we've known from before. So something doesn't make sense. A possible way to reconcile this is to suggest that the process of actually looking into the documents was pathetic. I am not saying whether that happened; only that it wouldn't surprise me at all. Could they use the brute force method you mention? Maybe. But maybe I'd walk into their offices and watch how they're actually doing it and smack my head.

TheDrake

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #308 on: January 31, 2023, 05:19:29 AM »
I also don't want to deep dive 7 years into the past, so I'm with you there. I just would say that won't and can't and didn't are all different words with very different meanings. You seemed to imply that it couldn't be done, and my observations here are limited to that.

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #309 on: March 21, 2023, 07:10:57 PM »
Not looking good for Trump.

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/sources-special-counsel-claims-trump-221048707.html

Again, it looks like he lied to his own lawyers.

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #310 on: March 22, 2023, 08:10:40 PM »
Well the lawyer has to turn over his papers.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/appeals-court-sides-justice-dept-201917118.html

Not looking good.

TheDrake

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #311 on: March 23, 2023, 06:52:58 AM »
All politically motivated, don't you see? We are edging closer to manifesting Trump's vision of steadfast report if he shot somebody dead on one of the busiest and most surveilled streets in America.

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #312 on: April 28, 2023, 03:48:43 PM »
Now Trump's legal team wants Congress to make what he says he didn't do a civil matter instead of a criminal one.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-legal-team-asks-house-155403695.html


msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #313 on: May 23, 2023, 04:25:52 PM »
Jack Smith seems to be focusing in on that fact that Trump was told he could not hold back documents after he was told to turn them back in.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-warned-retaining-classified-documents-100032459.html

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #314 on: May 23, 2023, 04:54:17 PM »
Former WH lawyer is fairly sure Trump will go to jail over the documents case.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-white-house-lawyer-says-150225486.html

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #315 on: May 24, 2023, 08:38:59 AM »

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #316 on: May 27, 2023, 04:40:53 PM »
Not looking good for Trump.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-workers-moved-classified-documents-220300281.html

The little people are going to be his down fall.

Ephrem Moseley

  • Members
  • Pacifist Fascist
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #317 on: Today at 07:20:44 AM »
There's a non-zero probability that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen.

It'll be pretty interesting if that is proven to be the case.

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #318 on: Today at 07:52:08 AM »
Ephram, there is 0 percent chance it was stolen.

Ephrem Moseley

  • Members
  • Pacifist Fascist
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #319 on: Today at 07:57:13 AM »
Ephram, there is 0 percent chance it was stolen.
Hahahahahahahaha.

Wanna bet? Let's bet $1 on that.

msquared

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #320 on: Today at 08:01:17 AM »
Well it has been 2-1/2 years and no evidence has been provided that has convinced any court in any county/State in the country.  Even in states run by Republicans. Audits, recounts, more audits. Nothing.

There has been small level fraud found, say like Mark Meadows being registered to vote in 2 states, or Republicans voting for dead relatives, but no voter fraud at any level that would change the outcome.

You can think there was fraud all you want, but since it did not happen, you have no evidence of it.

Ephrem Moseley

  • Members
  • Pacifist Fascist
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #321 on: Today at 08:04:09 AM »
Well it has been 2-1/2 years and no evidence has been provided that has convinced any court in any county/State in the country.  Even in states run by Republicans. Audits, recounts, more audits. Nothing.

There has been small level fraud found, say like Mark Meadows being registered to vote in 2 states, or Republicans voting for dead relatives, but no voter fraud at any level that would change the outcome.

You can think there was fraud all you want, but since it did not happen, you have no evidence of it.
Why don't you want to bet me then?

Let's bet that Trump becomes President before the election.

Okay?

DJQuag

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #322 on: Today at 08:07:01 AM »
There's a non-zero probability that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen.

It'll be pretty interesting if that is proven to be the case.

Could you please define the word stolen here? In context to your comment?

Do you mean there were false ballots? If so, why wasn't that case taken to court, and if it did go to court, what was the result?

I suspect you might be referring to how mass media focused on Trump and his exploits. What I think you're forgetting, due to eight years of a relatively scandal free Obama administration, is that the media has always, since the very beginning, been right up every President's arse. You think CNN declined to cover Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky? That they *weren't* covering that 24/7?

The social media aspect is new, but not new enough that soulless *censored* on both sides haven't begun making strategies to have Joe SixPack spread their ideas almost as well as a paid commercial, all at the cost of one intern tweeting a few times. How many fat and unhealthy people refused the COVID vaccine and died because their Facebook feed was full of lies? There's an entire subreddit dedicated to documenting it, it's r/HermanCainAward for those interested.

Ephrem Moseley

  • Members
  • Pacifist Fascist
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #323 on: Today at 08:14:13 AM »
There's a non-zero probability that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen.

It'll be pretty interesting if that is proven to be the case.

Could you please define the word stolen here? In context to your comment?

Do you mean there were false ballots? If so, why wasn't that case taken to court, and if it did go to court, what was the result?

I suspect you might be referring to how mass media focused on Trump and his exploits. What I think you're forgetting, due to eight years of a relatively scandal free Obama administration, is that the media has always, since the very beginning, been right up every President's arse. You think CNN declined to cover Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky? That they *weren't* covering that 24/7?

The social media aspect is new, but not new enough that soulless *censored* on both sides haven't begun making strategies to have Joe SixPack spread their ideas almost as well as a paid commercial, all at the cost of one intern tweeting a few times. How many fat and unhealthy people refused the COVID vaccine and died because their Facebook feed was full of lies? There's an entire subreddit dedicated to documenting it, it's r/HermanCainAward for those interested.
Imagine that Joe Biden is a puppet controlled by the Rothschilds.

Imagine the Rothschilds have blackmail material on every politician they want to have blackmail material on.

Can you connect the rest of the dots or should I?

Ephrem Moseley

  • Members
  • Pacifist Fascist
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #324 on: Today at 08:21:54 AM »
note: according to Google Trends, the most times "Rothschilds" has been searched for since 2004 was in November 2016.

hmmmmm

DJQuag

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #325 on: Today at 08:23:36 AM »
There's a non-zero probability that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen.

It'll be pretty interesting if that is proven to be the case.

Could you please define the word stolen here? In context to your comment?

Do you mean there were false ballots? If so, why wasn't that case taken to court, and if it did go to court, what was the result?

I suspect you might be referring to how mass media focused on Trump and his exploits. What I think you're forgetting, due to eight years of a relatively scandal free Obama administration, is that the media has always, since the very beginning, been right up every President's arse. You think CNN declined to cover Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky? That they *weren't* covering that 24/7?

The social media aspect is new, but not new enough that soulless *censored* on both sides haven't begun making strategies to have Joe SixPack spread their ideas almost as well as a paid commercial, all at the cost of one intern tweeting a few times. How many fat and unhealthy people refused the COVID vaccine and died because their Facebook feed was full of lies? There's an entire subreddit dedicated to documenting it, it's r/HermanCainAward for those interested.
Imagine that Joe Biden is a puppet controlled by the Rothschilds.

Imagine the Rothschilds have blackmail material on every politician they want to have blackmail material on.

Can you connect the rest of the dots or should I?

No need, I'm aware of conspiracy theories. I just don't believe them. Not to say I don't think billionaire level rich people aren't pulling off some wild BS in the background. Look at Musk manipulating Tesla stocks via Twitter and receiving a half million dollar fine. I just don't think there's an evil world council headed up by Soros or whoever.

Anyway, you never answered the question. Please define the word "stolen," in context to the 2020 election. I, and others, genuinely don't know what you mean by that.

DJQuag

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #326 on: Today at 08:24:44 AM »
note: according to Google Trends, the most times "Rothschilds" has been searched for since 2004 was in November 2016.

hmmmmm

Yes. Like I said, social media allows wild, undocumented stuff to spread stupidly fast. And if it was your friend who shared it with you, *surely* it must be right.

Ephrem Moseley

  • Members
  • Pacifist Fascist
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #327 on: Today at 08:30:14 AM »
There's a non-zero probability that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen.

It'll be pretty interesting if that is proven to be the case.

Could you please define the word stolen here? In context to your comment?

Do you mean there were false ballots? If so, why wasn't that case taken to court, and if it did go to court, what was the result?

I suspect you might be referring to how mass media focused on Trump and his exploits. What I think you're forgetting, due to eight years of a relatively scandal free Obama administration, is that the media has always, since the very beginning, been right up every President's arse. You think CNN declined to cover Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky? That they *weren't* covering that 24/7?

The social media aspect is new, but not new enough that soulless *censored* on both sides haven't begun making strategies to have Joe SixPack spread their ideas almost as well as a paid commercial, all at the cost of one intern tweeting a few times. How many fat and unhealthy people refused the COVID vaccine and died because their Facebook feed was full of lies? There's an entire subreddit dedicated to documenting it, it's r/HermanCainAward for those interested.
Imagine that Joe Biden is a puppet controlled by the Rothschilds.

Imagine the Rothschilds have blackmail material on every politician they want to have blackmail material on.

Can you connect the rest of the dots or should I?

No need, I'm aware of conspiracy theories. I just don't believe them. Not to say I don't think billionaire level rich people aren't pulling off some wild BS in the background. Look at Musk manipulating Tesla stocks via Twitter and receiving a half million dollar fine. I just don't think there's an evil world council headed up by Soros or whoever.

Anyway, you never answered the question. Please define the word "stolen," in context to the 2020 election. I, and others, genuinely don't know what you mean by that.
This is what I think is going on:

The richest family in the world is necessarily non-Christian.

Non-Christians have an endless number of boundaries to push that Christians do not.

For example: non-Christians, if their survival depends on it, will kill the innocent.

The richest family in the world is smarter than me.

The richest family in the world knows how to "steal" an election if their survival depends on it.

"Stolen" in this context, is, admittedly, difficult.

For example: what would have been the outcome of the election if the Steele Dossier never existed?

What if also, the CIA validated Hunter Biden's laptop as really his?

Votes can be stolen through lies, by tricking the non-critical thinkers, and there's a *lot* of them.

Ballots needn't be involved.

Brainwashing is sufficient to "steal" an election.

Ephrem Moseley

  • Members
  • Pacifist Fascist
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #328 on: Today at 08:37:02 AM »
So.

No one wants to be me $1 on this?

Ephrem Moseley

  • Members
  • Pacifist Fascist
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #329 on: Today at 08:45:36 AM »
I mean what's up with you people.

I'm offered the choice to kill my worst enemy WITH NO CONSEQUENCE, or die, then I choose to die.

Why?

Because I really, really, truly do believe in Heaven.

Heaven will be *better* than this, guaranteed.

I might be wrong about that, but it doesn't matter, and do you know why?

Because I believe in Heaven.

Free Will.

It doesn't matter.

DJQuag

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #330 on: Today at 08:49:56 AM »
I mean what's up with you people.

I'm offered the choice to kill my worst enemy WITH NO CONSEQUENCE, or die, then I choose to die.

Why?

Because I really, really, truly do believe in Heaven.

Heaven will be *better* than this, guaranteed.

I might be wrong about that, but it doesn't matter, and do you know why?

Because I believe in Heaven.

Free Will.

It doesn't matter.

My friend, we understand. As best we can. We just disagree. And we choose not to engage with you on these things. Whatever you have going on in your brain to sort these things out, surely, screaming into the aether on a message board with twenty people on it isn't required to get you to Heaven, yes?

DJQuag

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #331 on: Today at 08:52:29 AM »
There's a non-zero probability that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen.

It'll be pretty interesting if that is proven to be the case.

Could you please define the word stolen here? In context to your comment?

Do you mean there were false ballots? If so, why wasn't that case taken to court, and if it did go to court, what was the result?

I suspect you might be referring to how mass media focused on Trump and his exploits. What I think you're forgetting, due to eight years of a relatively scandal free Obama administration, is that the media has always, since the very beginning, been right up every President's arse. You think CNN declined to cover Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky? That they *weren't* covering that 24/7?

The social media aspect is new, but not new enough that soulless *censored* on both sides haven't begun making strategies to have Joe SixPack spread their ideas almost as well as a paid commercial, all at the cost of one intern tweeting a few times. How many fat and unhealthy people refused the COVID vaccine and died because their Facebook feed was full of lies? There's an entire subreddit dedicated to documenting it, it's r/HermanCainAward for those interested.
Imagine that Joe Biden is a puppet controlled by the Rothschilds.

Imagine the Rothschilds have blackmail material on every politician they want to have blackmail material on.

Can you connect the rest of the dots or should I?

No need, I'm aware of conspiracy theories. I just don't believe them. Not to say I don't think billionaire level rich people aren't pulling off some wild BS in the background. Look at Musk manipulating Tesla stocks via Twitter and receiving a half million dollar fine. I just don't think there's an evil world council headed up by Soros or whoever.

Anyway, you never answered the question. Please define the word "stolen," in context to the 2020 election. I, and others, genuinely don't know what you mean by that.
This is what I think is going on:

The richest family in the world is necessarily non-Christian.

Non-Christians have an endless number of boundaries to push that Christians do not.

For example: non-Christians, if their survival depends on it, will kill the innocent.

The richest family in the world is smarter than me.

The richest family in the world knows how to "steal" an election if their survival depends on it.

"Stolen" in this context, is, admittedly, difficult.

For example: what would have been the outcome of the election if the Steele Dossier never existed?

What if also, the CIA validated Hunter Biden's laptop as really his?

Votes can be stolen through lies, by tricking the non-critical thinkers, and there's a *lot* of them.

Ballots needn't be involved.

Brainwashing is sufficient to "steal" an election.

Hmm.

Is this theory similar to the one where the FBI announced an investigation into H.Clinton's emails that ultimately turned out to be nothing, just before a presidential election that she barely lost?

Perhaps the governmental organizations learned their lessons from *that* mistake and weren't eager to replicate it four years on.

Ephrem Moseley

  • Members
  • Pacifist Fascist
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #332 on: Today at 08:54:46 AM »
There's a non-zero probability that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen.

It'll be pretty interesting if that is proven to be the case.

Could you please define the word stolen here? In context to your comment?

Do you mean there were false ballots? If so, why wasn't that case taken to court, and if it did go to court, what was the result?

I suspect you might be referring to how mass media focused on Trump and his exploits. What I think you're forgetting, due to eight years of a relatively scandal free Obama administration, is that the media has always, since the very beginning, been right up every President's arse. You think CNN declined to cover Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky? That they *weren't* covering that 24/7?

The social media aspect is new, but not new enough that soulless *censored* on both sides haven't begun making strategies to have Joe SixPack spread their ideas almost as well as a paid commercial, all at the cost of one intern tweeting a few times. How many fat and unhealthy people refused the COVID vaccine and died because their Facebook feed was full of lies? There's an entire subreddit dedicated to documenting it, it's r/HermanCainAward for those interested.
Imagine that Joe Biden is a puppet controlled by the Rothschilds.

Imagine the Rothschilds have blackmail material on every politician they want to have blackmail material on.

Can you connect the rest of the dots or should I?

No need, I'm aware of conspiracy theories. I just don't believe them. Not to say I don't think billionaire level rich people aren't pulling off some wild BS in the background. Look at Musk manipulating Tesla stocks via Twitter and receiving a half million dollar fine. I just don't think there's an evil world council headed up by Soros or whoever.

Anyway, you never answered the question. Please define the word "stolen," in context to the 2020 election. I, and others, genuinely don't know what you mean by that.
This is what I think is going on:

The richest family in the world is necessarily non-Christian.

Non-Christians have an endless number of boundaries to push that Christians do not.

For example: non-Christians, if their survival depends on it, will kill the innocent.

The richest family in the world is smarter than me.

The richest family in the world knows how to "steal" an election if their survival depends on it.

"Stolen" in this context, is, admittedly, difficult.

For example: what would have been the outcome of the election if the Steele Dossier never existed?

What if also, the CIA validated Hunter Biden's laptop as really his?

Votes can be stolen through lies, by tricking the non-critical thinkers, and there's a *lot* of them.

Ballots needn't be involved.

Brainwashing is sufficient to "steal" an election.

Hmm.

Is this theory similar to the one where the FBI announced an investigation into H.Clinton's emails that ultimately turned out to be nothing, just before a presidential election that she barely lost?

Perhaps the governmental organizations learned their lessons from *that* mistake and weren't eager to replicate it four years on.
It's like you don't understand blackmail.

Do you understand blackmail?

Ephrem Moseley

  • Members
  • Pacifist Fascist
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #333 on: Today at 08:55:58 AM »
I mean what's up with you people.

I'm offered the choice to kill my worst enemy WITH NO CONSEQUENCE, or die, then I choose to die.

Why?

Because I really, really, truly do believe in Heaven.

Heaven will be *better* than this, guaranteed.

I might be wrong about that, but it doesn't matter, and do you know why?

Because I believe in Heaven.

Free Will.

It doesn't matter.

My friend, we understand. As best we can. We just disagree. And we choose not to engage with you on these things. Whatever you have going on in your brain to sort these things out, surely, screaming into the aether on a message board with twenty people on it isn't required to get you to Heaven, yes?
I am not your friend.

I am, in fact, your enemy; please refer to me as such, thanks.

If you don't bet me $1, you don't understand.

DJQuag

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #334 on: Today at 08:59:18 AM »
I mean what's up with you people.

I'm offered the choice to kill my worst enemy WITH NO CONSEQUENCE, or die, then I choose to die.

Why?

Because I really, really, truly do believe in Heaven.

Heaven will be *better* than this, guaranteed.

I might be wrong about that, but it doesn't matter, and do you know why?

Because I believe in Heaven.

Free Will.

It doesn't matter.

My friend, we understand. As best we can. We just disagree. And we choose not to engage with you on these things. Whatever you have going on in your brain to sort these things out, surely, screaming into the aether on a message board with twenty people on it isn't required to get you to Heaven, yes?
I am not your friend.

I am, in fact, your enemy; please refer to me as such, thanks.

If you don't bet me $1, you don't understand.

My apologies, I won't call you friend again. I'm a mental health support worker who works with mentally ill people, and somehow you triggered me into using my usual calming phrases. Don't worry, every now and then I run into one who gets upset about being called a friend, as well.

DJQuag

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #335 on: Today at 09:00:56 AM »
There's a non-zero probability that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen.

It'll be pretty interesting if that is proven to be the case.

Could you please define the word stolen here? In context to your comment?

Do you mean there were false ballots? If so, why wasn't that case taken to court, and if it did go to court, what was the result?

I suspect you might be referring to how mass media focused on Trump and his exploits. What I think you're forgetting, due to eight years of a relatively scandal free Obama administration, is that the media has always, since the very beginning, been right up every President's arse. You think CNN declined to cover Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky? That they *weren't* covering that 24/7?

The social media aspect is new, but not new enough that soulless *censored* on both sides haven't begun making strategies to have Joe SixPack spread their ideas almost as well as a paid commercial, all at the cost of one intern tweeting a few times. How many fat and unhealthy people refused the COVID vaccine and died because their Facebook feed was full of lies? There's an entire subreddit dedicated to documenting it, it's r/HermanCainAward for those interested.
Imagine that Joe Biden is a puppet controlled by the Rothschilds.

Imagine the Rothschilds have blackmail material on every politician they want to have blackmail material on.

Can you connect the rest of the dots or should I?

No need, I'm aware of conspiracy theories. I just don't believe them. Not to say I don't think billionaire level rich people aren't pulling off some wild BS in the background. Look at Musk manipulating Tesla stocks via Twitter and receiving a half million dollar fine. I just don't think there's an evil world council headed up by Soros or whoever.

Anyway, you never answered the question. Please define the word "stolen," in context to the 2020 election. I, and others, genuinely don't know what you mean by that.
This is what I think is going on:

The richest family in the world is necessarily non-Christian.

Non-Christians have an endless number of boundaries to push that Christians do not.

For example: non-Christians, if their survival depends on it, will kill the innocent.

The richest family in the world is smarter than me.

The richest family in the world knows how to "steal" an election if their survival depends on it.

"Stolen" in this context, is, admittedly, difficult.

For example: what would have been the outcome of the election if the Steele Dossier never existed?

What if also, the CIA validated Hunter Biden's laptop as really his?

Votes can be stolen through lies, by tricking the non-critical thinkers, and there's a *lot* of them.

Ballots needn't be involved.

Brainwashing is sufficient to "steal" an election.

Hmm.

Is this theory similar to the one where the FBI announced an investigation into H.Clinton's emails that ultimately turned out to be nothing, just before a presidential election that she barely lost?

Perhaps the governmental organizations learned their lessons from *that* mistake and weren't eager to replicate it four years on.
It's like you don't understand blackmail.

Do you understand blackmail?

I do understand the concept of blackmail. Could you please explain, in full detail, what you think has happened in this situation? Instead of just giving us vague implications?

Ephrem Moseley

  • Members
  • Pacifist Fascist
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #336 on: Today at 09:01:44 AM »
I mean what's up with you people.

I'm offered the choice to kill my worst enemy WITH NO CONSEQUENCE, or die, then I choose to die.

Why?

Because I really, really, truly do believe in Heaven.

Heaven will be *better* than this, guaranteed.

I might be wrong about that, but it doesn't matter, and do you know why?

Because I believe in Heaven.

Free Will.

It doesn't matter.

My friend, we understand. As best we can. We just disagree. And we choose not to engage with you on these things. Whatever you have going on in your brain to sort these things out, surely, screaming into the aether on a message board with twenty people on it isn't required to get you to Heaven, yes?
I am not your friend.

I am, in fact, your enemy; please refer to me as such, thanks.

If you don't bet me $1, you don't understand.

My apologies, I won't call you friend again. I'm a mental health support worker who works with mentally ill people, and somehow you triggered me into using my usual calming phrases. Don't worry, every now and then I run into one who gets upset about being called a friend, as well.
well what term do you tell your polar opposite non-friends (I just know you don't have enemies; well, maybe me now) to use for you?

Ephrem Moseley

  • Members
  • Pacifist Fascist
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #337 on: Today at 09:02:30 AM »
There's a non-zero probability that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen.

It'll be pretty interesting if that is proven to be the case.

Could you please define the word stolen here? In context to your comment?

Do you mean there were false ballots? If so, why wasn't that case taken to court, and if it did go to court, what was the result?

I suspect you might be referring to how mass media focused on Trump and his exploits. What I think you're forgetting, due to eight years of a relatively scandal free Obama administration, is that the media has always, since the very beginning, been right up every President's arse. You think CNN declined to cover Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky? That they *weren't* covering that 24/7?

The social media aspect is new, but not new enough that soulless *censored* on both sides haven't begun making strategies to have Joe SixPack spread their ideas almost as well as a paid commercial, all at the cost of one intern tweeting a few times. How many fat and unhealthy people refused the COVID vaccine and died because their Facebook feed was full of lies? There's an entire subreddit dedicated to documenting it, it's r/HermanCainAward for those interested.
Imagine that Joe Biden is a puppet controlled by the Rothschilds.

Imagine the Rothschilds have blackmail material on every politician they want to have blackmail material on.

Can you connect the rest of the dots or should I?

No need, I'm aware of conspiracy theories. I just don't believe them. Not to say I don't think billionaire level rich people aren't pulling off some wild BS in the background. Look at Musk manipulating Tesla stocks via Twitter and receiving a half million dollar fine. I just don't think there's an evil world council headed up by Soros or whoever.

Anyway, you never answered the question. Please define the word "stolen," in context to the 2020 election. I, and others, genuinely don't know what you mean by that.
This is what I think is going on:

The richest family in the world is necessarily non-Christian.

Non-Christians have an endless number of boundaries to push that Christians do not.

For example: non-Christians, if their survival depends on it, will kill the innocent.

The richest family in the world is smarter than me.

The richest family in the world knows how to "steal" an election if their survival depends on it.

"Stolen" in this context, is, admittedly, difficult.

For example: what would have been the outcome of the election if the Steele Dossier never existed?

What if also, the CIA validated Hunter Biden's laptop as really his?

Votes can be stolen through lies, by tricking the non-critical thinkers, and there's a *lot* of them.

Ballots needn't be involved.

Brainwashing is sufficient to "steal" an election.

Hmm.

Is this theory similar to the one where the FBI announced an investigation into H.Clinton's emails that ultimately turned out to be nothing, just before a presidential election that she barely lost?

Perhaps the governmental organizations learned their lessons from *that* mistake and weren't eager to replicate it four years on.
It's like you don't understand blackmail.

Do you understand blackmail?

I do understand the concept of blackmail. Could you please explain, in full detail, what you think has happened in this situation? Instead of just giving us vague implications?
Nope. I'm done here. If you don't get it, then I concede that I am the one here who is insane.

DJQuag

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #338 on: Today at 09:11:35 AM »
There's a non-zero probability that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen.

It'll be pretty interesting if that is proven to be the case.

Could you please define the word stolen here? In context to your comment?

Do you mean there were false ballots? If so, why wasn't that case taken to court, and if it did go to court, what was the result?

I suspect you might be referring to how mass media focused on Trump and his exploits. What I think you're forgetting, due to eight years of a relatively scandal free Obama administration, is that the media has always, since the very beginning, been right up every President's arse. You think CNN declined to cover Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky? That they *weren't* covering that 24/7?

The social media aspect is new, but not new enough that soulless *censored* on both sides haven't begun making strategies to have Joe SixPack spread their ideas almost as well as a paid commercial, all at the cost of one intern tweeting a few times. How many fat and unhealthy people refused the COVID vaccine and died because their Facebook feed was full of lies? There's an entire subreddit dedicated to documenting it, it's r/HermanCainAward for those interested.
Imagine that Joe Biden is a puppet controlled by the Rothschilds.

Imagine the Rothschilds have blackmail material on every politician they want to have blackmail material on.

Can you connect the rest of the dots or should I?

No need, I'm aware of conspiracy theories. I just don't believe them. Not to say I don't think billionaire level rich people aren't pulling off some wild BS in the background. Look at Musk manipulating Tesla stocks via Twitter and receiving a half million dollar fine. I just don't think there's an evil world council headed up by Soros or whoever.

Anyway, you never answered the question. Please define the word "stolen," in context to the 2020 election. I, and others, genuinely don't know what you mean by that.
This is what I think is going on:

The richest family in the world is necessarily non-Christian.

Non-Christians have an endless number of boundaries to push that Christians do not.

For example: non-Christians, if their survival depends on it, will kill the innocent.

The richest family in the world is smarter than me.

The richest family in the world knows how to "steal" an election if their survival depends on it.

"Stolen" in this context, is, admittedly, difficult.

For example: what would have been the outcome of the election if the Steele Dossier never existed?

What if also, the CIA validated Hunter Biden's laptop as really his?

Votes can be stolen through lies, by tricking the non-critical thinkers, and there's a *lot* of them.

Ballots needn't be involved.

Brainwashing is sufficient to "steal" an election.

Hmm.

Is this theory similar to the one where the FBI announced an investigation into H.Clinton's emails that ultimately turned out to be nothing, just before a presidential election that she barely lost?

Perhaps the governmental organizations learned their lessons from *that* mistake and weren't eager to replicate it four years on.
It's like you don't understand blackmail.

Do you understand blackmail?

I do understand the concept of blackmail. Could you please explain, in full detail, what you think has happened in this situation? Instead of just giving us vague implications?
Nope. I'm done here. If you don't get it, then I concede that I am the one here who is insane.

Insane is an ugly word, full of implications. I think you could benefit from reaching out and talking to unbiased people, who have qualifications to help people feel better about themselves and their situation. I hope you do so.

Ephrem Moseley

  • Members
  • Pacifist Fascist
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #339 on: Today at 09:14:16 AM »
There's a non-zero probability that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen.

It'll be pretty interesting if that is proven to be the case.

Could you please define the word stolen here? In context to your comment?

Do you mean there were false ballots? If so, why wasn't that case taken to court, and if it did go to court, what was the result?

I suspect you might be referring to how mass media focused on Trump and his exploits. What I think you're forgetting, due to eight years of a relatively scandal free Obama administration, is that the media has always, since the very beginning, been right up every President's arse. You think CNN declined to cover Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky? That they *weren't* covering that 24/7?

The social media aspect is new, but not new enough that soulless *censored* on both sides haven't begun making strategies to have Joe SixPack spread their ideas almost as well as a paid commercial, all at the cost of one intern tweeting a few times. How many fat and unhealthy people refused the COVID vaccine and died because their Facebook feed was full of lies? There's an entire subreddit dedicated to documenting it, it's r/HermanCainAward for those interested.
Imagine that Joe Biden is a puppet controlled by the Rothschilds.

Imagine the Rothschilds have blackmail material on every politician they want to have blackmail material on.

Can you connect the rest of the dots or should I?

No need, I'm aware of conspiracy theories. I just don't believe them. Not to say I don't think billionaire level rich people aren't pulling off some wild BS in the background. Look at Musk manipulating Tesla stocks via Twitter and receiving a half million dollar fine. I just don't think there's an evil world council headed up by Soros or whoever.

Anyway, you never answered the question. Please define the word "stolen," in context to the 2020 election. I, and others, genuinely don't know what you mean by that.
This is what I think is going on:

The richest family in the world is necessarily non-Christian.

Non-Christians have an endless number of boundaries to push that Christians do not.

For example: non-Christians, if their survival depends on it, will kill the innocent.

The richest family in the world is smarter than me.

The richest family in the world knows how to "steal" an election if their survival depends on it.

"Stolen" in this context, is, admittedly, difficult.

For example: what would have been the outcome of the election if the Steele Dossier never existed?

What if also, the CIA validated Hunter Biden's laptop as really his?

Votes can be stolen through lies, by tricking the non-critical thinkers, and there's a *lot* of them.

Ballots needn't be involved.

Brainwashing is sufficient to "steal" an election.

Hmm.

Is this theory similar to the one where the FBI announced an investigation into H.Clinton's emails that ultimately turned out to be nothing, just before a presidential election that she barely lost?

Perhaps the governmental organizations learned their lessons from *that* mistake and weren't eager to replicate it four years on.
It's like you don't understand blackmail.

Do you understand blackmail?

I do understand the concept of blackmail. Could you please explain, in full detail, what you think has happened in this situation? Instead of just giving us vague implications?
Nope. I'm done here. If you don't get it, then I concede that I am the one here who is insane.

Insane is an ugly word, full of implications. I think you could benefit from reaching out and talking to unbiased people, who have qualifications to help people feel better about themselves and their situation. I hope you do so.
Unbiased?

Do you mean, agnostic?

I like agnostics.

When I ask agnostics hot-button questions (like, "are transwomen women?") they say "I don't know" and they mean it.

I like those kinds of people don't you?

No. No, you don't.

DJQuag

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #340 on: Today at 09:14:50 AM »
I mean what's up with you people.

I'm offered the choice to kill my worst enemy WITH NO CONSEQUENCE, or die, then I choose to die.

Why?

Because I really, really, truly do believe in Heaven.

Heaven will be *better* than this, guaranteed.

I might be wrong about that, but it doesn't matter, and do you know why?

Because I believe in Heaven.

Free Will.

It doesn't matter.

My friend, we understand. As best we can. We just disagree. And we choose not to engage with you on these things. Whatever you have going on in your brain to sort these things out, surely, screaming into the aether on a message board with twenty people on it isn't required to get you to Heaven, yes?
I am not your friend.

I am, in fact, your enemy; please refer to me as such, thanks.

If you don't bet me $1, you don't understand.

My apologies, I won't call you friend again. I'm a mental health support worker who works with mentally ill people, and somehow you triggered me into using my usual calming phrases. Don't worry, every now and then I run into one who gets upset about being called a friend, as well.
well what term do you tell your polar opposite non-friends (I just know you don't have enemies; well, maybe me now) to use for you?

If they object to being called friend or mate, (in the English sense of it being a synonym to friend,) I just call them their name. I'm happy to refer to you using your preferred terms. Do you think that's fair? Referring to people in the way they would like to be referred to?

Ephrem Moseley

  • Members
  • Pacifist Fascist
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #341 on: Today at 09:17:52 AM »
I mean what's up with you people.

I'm offered the choice to kill my worst enemy WITH NO CONSEQUENCE, or die, then I choose to die.

Why?

Because I really, really, truly do believe in Heaven.

Heaven will be *better* than this, guaranteed.

I might be wrong about that, but it doesn't matter, and do you know why?

Because I believe in Heaven.

Free Will.

It doesn't matter.

My friend, we understand. As best we can. We just disagree. And we choose not to engage with you on these things. Whatever you have going on in your brain to sort these things out, surely, screaming into the aether on a message board with twenty people on it isn't required to get you to Heaven, yes?
I am not your friend.

I am, in fact, your enemy; please refer to me as such, thanks.

If you don't bet me $1, you don't understand.

My apologies, I won't call you friend again. I'm a mental health support worker who works with mentally ill people, and somehow you triggered me into using my usual calming phrases. Don't worry, every now and then I run into one who gets upset about being called a friend, as well.
well what term do you tell your polar opposite non-friends (I just know you don't have enemies; well, maybe me now) to use for you?

If they object to being called friend or mate, (in the English sense of it being a synonym to friend,) I just call them their name. I'm happy to refer to you using your preferred terms. Do you think that's fair? Referring to people in the way they would like to be referred to?
Your non-answer confirms what I thought. Thanks

DJQuag

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #342 on: Today at 09:21:34 AM »
There's a non-zero probability that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen.

It'll be pretty interesting if that is proven to be the case.

Could you please define the word stolen here? In context to your comment?

Do you mean there were false ballots? If so, why wasn't that case taken to court, and if it did go to court, what was the result?

I suspect you might be referring to how mass media focused on Trump and his exploits. What I think you're forgetting, due to eight years of a relatively scandal free Obama administration, is that the media has always, since the very beginning, been right up every President's arse. You think CNN declined to cover Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky? That they *weren't* covering that 24/7?

The social media aspect is new, but not new enough that soulless *censored* on both sides haven't begun making strategies to have Joe SixPack spread their ideas almost as well as a paid commercial, all at the cost of one intern tweeting a few times. How many fat and unhealthy people refused the COVID vaccine and died because their Facebook feed was full of lies? There's an entire subreddit dedicated to documenting it, it's r/HermanCainAward for those interested.
Imagine that Joe Biden is a puppet controlled by the Rothschilds.

Imagine the Rothschilds have blackmail material on every politician they want to have blackmail material on.

Can you connect the rest of the dots or should I?

No need, I'm aware of conspiracy theories. I just don't believe them. Not to say I don't think billionaire level rich people aren't pulling off some wild BS in the background. Look at Musk manipulating Tesla stocks via Twitter and receiving a half million dollar fine. I just don't think there's an evil world council headed up by Soros or whoever.

Anyway, you never answered the question. Please define the word "stolen," in context to the 2020 election. I, and others, genuinely don't know what you mean by that.
This is what I think is going on:

The richest family in the world is necessarily non-Christian.

Non-Christians have an endless number of boundaries to push that Christians do not.

For example: non-Christians, if their survival depends on it, will kill the innocent.

The richest family in the world is smarter than me.

The richest family in the world knows how to "steal" an election if their survival depends on it.

"Stolen" in this context, is, admittedly, difficult.

For example: what would have been the outcome of the election if the Steele Dossier never existed?

What if also, the CIA validated Hunter Biden's laptop as really his?

Votes can be stolen through lies, by tricking the non-critical thinkers, and there's a *lot* of them.

Ballots needn't be involved.

Brainwashing is sufficient to "steal" an election.

Hmm.

Is this theory similar to the one where the FBI announced an investigation into H.Clinton's emails that ultimately turned out to be nothing, just before a presidential election that she barely lost?

Perhaps the governmental organizations learned their lessons from *that* mistake and weren't eager to replicate it four years on.
It's like you don't understand blackmail.

Do you understand blackmail?

I do understand the concept of blackmail. Could you please explain, in full detail, what you think has happened in this situation? Instead of just giving us vague implications?
Nope. I'm done here. If you don't get it, then I concede that I am the one here who is insane.

Insane is an ugly word, full of implications. I think you could benefit from reaching out and talking to unbiased people, who have qualifications to help people feel better about themselves and their situation. I hope you do so.
Unbiased?

Do you mean, agnostic?

I like agnostics.

When I ask agnostics hot-button questions (like, "are transwomen women?") they say "I don't know" and they mean it.

I like those kinds of people don't you?

No. No, you don't.

It can be hard to find a therapist out there that vibes, and sometimes you have to try a few times to find one that works with you. Just like a spouse. I encourage you to find a therapist even if there's some legwork involved.

Please don't use your predetermined decision of how I think to formulate your replies. I do not, in fact, dislike agnostics. I love agnostics. If they are truly agnostic, it's a chance to give them my arguments and perhaps it will sway them.

DJQuag

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #343 on: Today at 09:22:16 AM »
I mean what's up with you people.

I'm offered the choice to kill my worst enemy WITH NO CONSEQUENCE, or die, then I choose to die.

Why?

Because I really, really, truly do believe in Heaven.

Heaven will be *better* than this, guaranteed.

I might be wrong about that, but it doesn't matter, and do you know why?

Because I believe in Heaven.

Free Will.

It doesn't matter.

My friend, we understand. As best we can. We just disagree. And we choose not to engage with you on these things. Whatever you have going on in your brain to sort these things out, surely, screaming into the aether on a message board with twenty people on it isn't required to get you to Heaven, yes?
I am not your friend.

I am, in fact, your enemy; please refer to me as such, thanks.

If you don't bet me $1, you don't understand.

My apologies, I won't call you friend again. I'm a mental health support worker who works with mentally ill people, and somehow you triggered me into using my usual calming phrases. Don't worry, every now and then I run into one who gets upset about being called a friend, as well.
well what term do you tell your polar opposite non-friends (I just know you don't have enemies; well, maybe me now) to use for you?

If they object to being called friend or mate, (in the English sense of it being a synonym to friend,) I just call them their name. I'm happy to refer to you using your preferred terms. Do you think that's fair? Referring to people in the way they would like to be referred to?
Your non-answer confirms what I thought. Thanks

Lol. I flat out said I'd call you your name. No none answer there, Ephrem.

Ephrem Moseley

  • Members
  • Pacifist Fascist
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #344 on: Today at 09:24:48 AM »
There's a non-zero probability that the 2020 Presidential election was stolen.

It'll be pretty interesting if that is proven to be the case.

Could you please define the word stolen here? In context to your comment?

Do you mean there were false ballots? If so, why wasn't that case taken to court, and if it did go to court, what was the result?

I suspect you might be referring to how mass media focused on Trump and his exploits. What I think you're forgetting, due to eight years of a relatively scandal free Obama administration, is that the media has always, since the very beginning, been right up every President's arse. You think CNN declined to cover Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky? That they *weren't* covering that 24/7?

The social media aspect is new, but not new enough that soulless *censored* on both sides haven't begun making strategies to have Joe SixPack spread their ideas almost as well as a paid commercial, all at the cost of one intern tweeting a few times. How many fat and unhealthy people refused the COVID vaccine and died because their Facebook feed was full of lies? There's an entire subreddit dedicated to documenting it, it's r/HermanCainAward for those interested.
Imagine that Joe Biden is a puppet controlled by the Rothschilds.

Imagine the Rothschilds have blackmail material on every politician they want to have blackmail material on.

Can you connect the rest of the dots or should I?

No need, I'm aware of conspiracy theories. I just don't believe them. Not to say I don't think billionaire level rich people aren't pulling off some wild BS in the background. Look at Musk manipulating Tesla stocks via Twitter and receiving a half million dollar fine. I just don't think there's an evil world council headed up by Soros or whoever.

Anyway, you never answered the question. Please define the word "stolen," in context to the 2020 election. I, and others, genuinely don't know what you mean by that.
This is what I think is going on:

The richest family in the world is necessarily non-Christian.

Non-Christians have an endless number of boundaries to push that Christians do not.

For example: non-Christians, if their survival depends on it, will kill the innocent.

The richest family in the world is smarter than me.

The richest family in the world knows how to "steal" an election if their survival depends on it.

"Stolen" in this context, is, admittedly, difficult.

For example: what would have been the outcome of the election if the Steele Dossier never existed?

What if also, the CIA validated Hunter Biden's laptop as really his?

Votes can be stolen through lies, by tricking the non-critical thinkers, and there's a *lot* of them.

Ballots needn't be involved.

Brainwashing is sufficient to "steal" an election.

Hmm.

Is this theory similar to the one where the FBI announced an investigation into H.Clinton's emails that ultimately turned out to be nothing, just before a presidential election that she barely lost?

Perhaps the governmental organizations learned their lessons from *that* mistake and weren't eager to replicate it four years on.
It's like you don't understand blackmail.

Do you understand blackmail?

I do understand the concept of blackmail. Could you please explain, in full detail, what you think has happened in this situation? Instead of just giving us vague implications?
Nope. I'm done here. If you don't get it, then I concede that I am the one here who is insane.

Insane is an ugly word, full of implications. I think you could benefit from reaching out and talking to unbiased people, who have qualifications to help people feel better about themselves and their situation. I hope you do so.
Unbiased?

Do you mean, agnostic?

I like agnostics.

When I ask agnostics hot-button questions (like, "are transwomen women?") they say "I don't know" and they mean it.

I like those kinds of people don't you?

No. No, you don't.

It can be hard to find a therapist out there that vibes, and sometimes you have to try a few times to find one that works with you. Just like a spouse. I encourage you to find a therapist even if there's some legwork involved.

Please don't use your predetermined decision of how I think to formulate your replies. I do not, in fact, dislike agnostics. I love agnostics. If they are truly agnostic, it's a chance to give them my arguments and perhaps it will sway them.
oh it is!

they're being swayed in the direction you don't want them to go in, though

once we're 51% pro-life, you'll be ruled by the insane, and no, I won't stop using that term, because I truly *am* insane from your POV

I do insane things

sometimes I kill millions of people

boy I'm glad I'm not ruled by the insane, phew

DJQuag

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #345 on: Today at 09:31:38 AM »
I'm interested to hear how you have killed millions of people. Sounds like a lot of work, to be honest.

Ephrem Moseley

  • Members
  • Pacifist Fascist
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #346 on: Today at 09:34:36 AM »
I'm interested to hear how you have killed millions of people. Sounds like a lot of work, to be honest.
"transgender butch lesbian"

DJQuag

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #347 on: Today at 09:35:59 AM »
I'm interested to hear how you have killed millions of people. Sounds like a lot of work, to be honest.
"transgender butch lesbian"

I'm sorry, the board caught you muttering something under your breath. Was that response supposed to mean anything to those who don't have a pipeline to your mind?

Ephrem Moseley

  • Members
  • Pacifist Fascist
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #348 on: Today at 09:37:53 AM »
I'm interested to hear how you have killed millions of people. Sounds like a lot of work, to be honest.
"transgender butch lesbian"

I'm sorry, the board caught you muttering something under your breath. Was that response supposed to mean anything to those who don't have a pipeline to your mind?
I get tired.

Go find a genius.

DJQuag

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Papers
« Reply #349 on: Today at 09:47:32 AM »
I'm interested to hear how you have killed millions of people. Sounds like a lot of work, to be honest.
"transgender butch lesbian"

I'm sorry, the board caught you muttering something under your breath. Was that response supposed to mean anything to those who don't have a pipeline to your mind?
I get tired.

Go find a genius.

The world is *censored*ty and even a genius probably couldn't fix it. I suggest you stop trying so hard to do so. Stop attacking people, make some friends, and do some good in your local community.

I'm relieved that you couldn't bring evidence of you killing millions, though. I might have had to report that to the mod.