[Cheap shot stereotype -based slur against Pete's former profession]
Man up and admit you blew it on the Hitler quote instead of trying to make it seem like I stepped in something.
I blew the quote question. And you didn't step in anything. Stepping in something would imply that your wrongdoing was careless or accidental, like mine was when I proceeded as if you were arguing in good faith. You didn't step in, you dug this trench, doubled down, and fortified it.
You have twice dodged my question of whether Cloven Bundy actually said God had given federal land to the MORMONS so I can only infer that
1. you will not answer the question, because
2. You misrepresented Bundy, who was not actually talking about Mormons.
3. You see this discussion as some sort of contest, and
4. You don't care about the truth but only about looking good and making your opponent look bad , which is why
5. You hold no consistent moral or ethic or principle but adopt whatever ethos which best suits your strategy to smear what your opponent finds sacred.
You showed nothing but loathing for Cliven Bundy and his cause and only used the word Devout to describe him, to piss on Mormonism. If there wasn't a Mormon-affiliated person you wanted to piss off in the room, you never would have made the assertion.
How are you any better than G2? You play the same games, same methods.
Man up and admit that you have no dog in the fight of whether Hitler was Christian or whether Bundy is "devout" but only say that crap to piss on the religion to play superior to adherents.
"Despite Pete's suspicions about my attitudes, when I talk about how people use their faith for purposes other than expressing their beliefs I wonder about their motives and often their honesty. "
Then why do you take Hitler's Mean Kampf assertions on Dogberry like faith?