Some arguments were made that didn't actually refute the points.
Briefly, no evidence for
serious voter fraud was found. Period. If you want to define "serious" as a college student voting in the wrong place, and one actual case of voting twice, knock yourself out.
The example of open borders was for illustrating that not everything can be an opinion and therefore immune from being labeled false. But to smash your argument, one would just have to show that Trump had a very clear definition of open borders that was not met by Democrats. Oh wait,
already did that.
As far as the GDP and unemployment rate, I said it was not a big deal. What is notable that the chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers admitted the mistake, but Trump never did. But again, not a big deal.
And finally NATO. Does the US choose to spend more based on what other countries spend on their own defense? Could be, but we don't know. What we do know is that there is an explicit agreement on what defense spending goals are. Every country is in compliance with that agreement. Nobody owes anybody anything. Period. Not "my view", not preconceptions, not "understood in context". Hard, cold, point of fact. I really don't understand why an intelligent person devotes effort in trying to say that is not true.
Characterizing an investigation as "Obama era" has the unquestionable intent of casting doubt on its validity, to frame it as purely partisan. Do you deny that? Given that the indictable offense was after the Obama era, that characterization is misleading at best. If you choose to interpret that characterization as neutral, knock yourself out.
But might it have started in the Obama era? Sure, so I can't prove it is false, just misleading.
Still waiting on your response to
North Korea not being a nuclear threat anymore
completely misrepresenting polls
misrepresenting the $150K 9/11 grant
seeing people jump out of the WTC from 4 miles away
Puerto Rico death tolls
attributing statements to Richard Blumenthal that verge on hallucinatory
taking credit for passing a law passed in 2014
claiming Democrats will not protect pre-existing conditions
I'll work on some more once you address those.