Author Topic: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?  (Read 5993 times)

Greg Davidson

  • Members
    • View Profile
Conservatives often claim that they don't hear Muslims properly condemn the ideology of hatred that inspires acts of terrorism by Islamic extremists. That includes a number of those who post here on Ornery. Well, the grotesque events of this week provide an opportunity to test the sincerity of those condemnations: 

Wednesday - A shooter attempts to get into a black church, when that fails he goes into a Kroeger's and executes two African Americans but tells a white guy "whites don't shoot whites"

Friday - The largest number of simultaneous political assassination attempts in American history, with the targets being those identified by the President, Fox News, and the right-wing media as enemies of the people

Saturday - Pittsburgh shooter, echoing the narrative from the President, Fox News, and the right-wing media about Jews bringing in "hostile invaders to dwell among us?", kills 11 Americans at a Synagogue.

Under President Trump, the US government-supported Radio Marti put out a program five months ago attacking George Soros as  “multimillionaire Jew” and “the architect of the financial collapse of 2008.”  Soros was one of the targets of Friday's assassination attempts


So, any condemnations of this ideology from Republicans?

 

Crunch

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2018, 11:23:54 PM »
You spend too much time on Daily Kos and MSNBC.

TheDeamon

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2018, 12:12:05 AM »
I've been largely tuned out, and as this forum is basically the only lens through which I'm getting most (recent) news, I'm in the dark on this. Probably prefer to remain that way.

1st Issue: Really Weird for White Supremacists specifically, who are allegedly aligned "with the political right" to go out on shooting sprees just weeks before an election where it is very possible that the Democrats will at least take control of the House of Representatives, if not the Senate as well. This kind of activity isn't likely to help bolster the numbers in favor of Republicans.

Unless of course the people pulling the strings for those groups have agendas that lie elsewhere.... (That and well, general prosperity works against their recruitment efforts, embittered persons are far easier to recruit for such groups than people who are happy with how things are going in their life. So getting the Republicans out of control suits their interests at this point.)

So these "Right Wing Wackos" coming out of the woodwork just before the election is really bizarre and counter-productive to serving the interests of Republicans, Conservatives and Libertarians. I'm not going to claim a conspiracy exists, I can see grounds for the genuinely insane believing they "were helping" with what they did. I can also see people acting autonomously to serve their own particular agendas and "guiding" others to help further it. I highly doubt there is any kind of diabolical mastermind scripting what just happened though.

That said, the persons involved certainly need psychological help, and should spend plenty of time locked away from the rest of society at large. Their behavior is unacceptable at any time, in any place, and a civil society should not tolerate it.

Greg Davidson

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2018, 01:25:45 AM »
Islamic terrorists sometimes commit attacks at times that are not politically convenient for their causes. But those who complain about the lack of condemnation from other Muslims do not believe that excuses their behavior. Why should America's Republicans be held to a lower standard?

Grant

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2018, 07:44:19 AM »
 ::)

cherrypoptart

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2018, 08:43:28 AM »
What is the ideology and can the ideology be separated from acts of violence?

In other words, maybe the ideology doesn't need to be condemned, only the acts of violence do.

But I'm not sure exactly what the ideology is. Maybe it needs to be condemned too. Did he have some sort of anti-Israel ideology like BDS meaning Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions? Could being for BDS lead some people to violence?

Grant

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #6 on: October 28, 2018, 09:28:45 AM »
Conservatives often claim that they don't hear Muslims properly condemn the ideology of hatred that inspires acts of terrorism by Islamic extremists. That includes a number of those who post here on Ornery. Well, the grotesque events of this week provide an opportunity to test the sincerity of those condemnations: 

So, any condemnations of this ideology from Republicans?

So much to break down here.  I'll start with this.  Here we have a real problem.  Politically motivated violence and it's growth in America.  I've written on this before, and I'm of the opinion that this is a serious problem with potential serious results, unlike, say, 5000 Hondurans trying to get to the US, or petulant NFL players, or how full of it any particular Senator is. 

Let's look at how this problem is approached by Greg:

1. Conservatives condemn Y not condemning action X
2. Do Conservatives condemn action x when conducted by Conservatives?
3. Have Republicans condemned action x when conducted by Conservatives?

Right away, we can see that the subject of the post is not on the condemnation of the ideologies that lead to terrorism.  The question asked is "Are conservatives and republicans hypocrites"?  You could have just said that, Greg, and saved space.  And instead of leaving the question un-answered, waiting for some defense, you could have straight up made the accusation instead of letting it hang over the discussion.  It's clever rhetoric though.  Perfectly in-bounds.  But really, you could have just come out and accused Republicans of being hypocrites, because we all know that's what is happening here.

Where to go from there?  So much to break down...

Let's start with condemning the "ideology of hatred" that leads to terrorist actions.  This is to differentiate between condemning politically motivated violence itself, and condemning whatever motivated it.  You could argue that these latest wackos were motivated by President Trump, or Alex Jones, or Henry Ford, or Louis Farrakhan if you'd like.  But Greg, you have not specified what you believe is the exact "ideology of hatred" you would like conservatives to condemn.  Is it Trump's condemnation of "globalists", which some people have accused of being a dog whistle for jews?  A sane person could probably differentiate, but sane people are not usually moved to political violence by political rhetoric. 

So until we know exactly which "ideology of hatred" we are talking about, we don't know exactly the standards you feel we should be judging Republicans on. 

I do know that several Republicans and Democrats have often denounced political violence itself, and have asked for toning down political rhetoric that motivates wackos to commit political violence.  Often this takes the form of trying to score political points.  Is the problem 1)political violence, 2)rhetoric that creates it, or 3)conservatives/liberals who use such rhetoric?  How is the question/problem presented?  What is the focus? 

Next:

Quote
Friday - The largest number of simultaneous political assassination attempts in American history, with the targets being those identified by the President, Fox News, and the right-wing media as enemies of the people

Let's be honest.  An assassin that mails out fake bombs is a pretty poor assassin.  I'd be tempted to not even call him an assassin, or what he attempted to do as assassination attempts.  Labeling it as assassination attempts is the only thing that may be as pathetic as mailing fake bombs IF you were actually trying to assassinate anybody.  It's possible that this person was so *censored*ing crazy that he actually believed that fake bombs could kill people.  It's also possible that some people are so *censored*ing stupid that they believe that fake bombs constitutes an assassination attempt. 

This is not to say that it's ok to make bomb threats, send powdered sugar through the mail, or whatever.  It's wrong.  It's a crime.  It's a threat.  It's politically motivated threatened violence.  People who do it should go to prison.  I wouldn't mind if we executed them publicly.  It's not to say that this is a sign of a bigger problem, and that political violence needs to be condemned and  But as assassination attempts go, this one is off the scale in bad planning. 

Quote
Saturday - Pittsburgh shooter, echoing the narrative from the President, Fox News, and the right-wing media about Jews bringing in "hostile invaders to dwell among us?", kills 11 Americans at a Synagogue.

OK.  I think we have a better idea now of what you believe "hateful ideology" is.  The narrative from Cheetoh Jesus and the right-wing media about Jews bringing in hostile invaders.  I'm unaware of this narrative, but I probably don't watch as much right-wing media as you do.  Nevertheless, the first counter should be that making a statement X, does not equate to making statement Y.  Saying Jews are bringing in hostile invaders is not the same as saying "go shoot Jews".  We've all been there.  We all know that normal people don't shoot up synagogues because of what Fox News or T-Rex Trump says. 

Nevertheless, I think it's valid that the growth in political violence can be traced to the growth in hostile political rhetoric.  It's a systemic problem.  Conservatives sometimes do it, and so do Liberals.  There is plenty of blame to go around.  Personally, I don't think that it will end until the people that generally make such hostile political rhetoric are ignored.  That's why I don't watch a lot of cable news or pay much mind to people on forums who couch either Republicans or Liberals as the primary problem in America.  That's at least something of a solution, rather than throwing blame around constantly, or accusing each other of being hypocrites. 

Quote
Under President Trump, the US government-supported Radio Marti put out a program five months ago attacking George Soros as  “multimillionaire Jew” and “the architect of the financial collapse of 2008.”  Soros was one of the targets of Friday's assassination attempts

I'm at the point that I believe that you either do not know what an actual assassination attempt is, or that you are deliberately misleading.  One requires an attempt at re-education.  The other demands ostracism. 

I havn't listened to Radio Marti.  I believe that George Soros is indeed a multimillionaire jew, though I do not believe that either he, or the Rothschilds, or the Gnomes of Zurich, are the architects behind the financial collapse of 2008.  I thought Barny Frank was, or maybe the Fed Reserve, or whatever else you'd like to pick.  As far as I know, nobody has tried to assassinate any of them. 

Antisemitism is a real problem in America.  It's pervasive, and it needs to be addressed, as do all kinds of racism and sexism.  I'm not sure if Radio Marti, or condemning Radio Marti, is part of the solution, though I really don't even know what Radio Marti is.  Antisemitism seems to draw a great deal of conspiracy theorists and wackos.  Conspiracy theorists and wackos are going to be drawn to something, always.  I think we can condemn crazy speech, but condemning political violence is first and foremost the most important. 

Quote
So, any condemnations of this ideology from Republicans?

Well, Greg.  Since you're so fixated on this, I will condemn whatever it is that you are talking about. Blank check.  Go ahead. 

I hereby condemn whomever attempts to frame a particular person, or particular groups of persons, as the source of a problem. 
I hereby condemn whomever attempts to otherize or call into question the underlying morality of any particular person or groups of persons
I hereby condemn political rhetoric that attempts to frame those of different ideologies as underlying source of a problem.

There ya go, Greg.  You have just one conservative republican.  I'm sure I'm the only one in the universe who condemns this.  You should look and prove me right.


Grant

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #8 on: October 28, 2018, 09:37:10 AM »
Conservatives often claim that they don't hear Muslims properly condemn the ideology of hatred that inspires acts of terrorism by Islamic extremists. That includes a number of those who post here on Ornery. Well, the grotesque events of this week provide an opportunity to test the sincerity of those condemnations: 

Oh yeah.  Forgot about this.  Condemning ideology that inspires "acts of terrorism". 

I'm sure you've all read my writing on the definition of terrorism.  About how we seriously need to reign it back.  About how "terrorism" is being used as one of those pieces of political rhetoric that drives people nuts. 

I will simply reiterate my belief that a lone wacko, or several lone wackos, should not be considered terrorists.  A terrorist, IMO, is a member of a terrorist organization.  It implies a greater level of threat than simply lone wackos. 

Lone wackos are certainly a problem, and the rhetoric that can incite them.  But the threat presented by lone wackos pales in comparison to the threat that a serious terrorist organization can present.  Ask Bautista or Diem or Nicholas II.  Ask the Israelis.  Ask the West Germans. 

TheDeamon

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #9 on: October 28, 2018, 09:46:35 AM »
Islamic terrorists sometimes commit attacks at times that are not politically convenient for their causes. But those who complain about the lack of condemnation from other Muslims do not believe that excuses their behavior. Why should America's Republicans be held to a lower standard?

As Cherry asked, what is it exactly we're supposed to be condemning?

There are lots of things I'm more than happy to say I will not support people who advocate(or actually go about) doing _____ things.

However, there are a lot of other things where much more nuance is needed in the "how and why" of how it is approached unless you want to open the door wide open for an authoritarian and/or totalitarian government.

Crunch

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #10 on: October 28, 2018, 10:34:32 AM »
What are you supposed to be condemning? Nothing. Trump, Pence, all the way down have condemned political violence. Consistently and in the strongest possible terms. You can see these denunciations Greg claims he wants on Twitter, news broadcasts, and other media. We’ve all seen them. So it’s not denouncing that he wants, that’s been done.

What this is about is confessing. In North Korea it’s called “saenghwal ch’onghwa”. What’s really being demanded here is that you stand up in front of everyone and confess, then beg forgiveness. That you’re not guilty of the crimes he’s accused you of is completely irrelevant, confessesing to them is what matters.

You must confess and abase yourself begging for forgiveness. If you do a sufficiently humiliating job of it, you may be allowed to go home. A few will have to go to a camp as a lesson for others.

TheDeamon

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #11 on: October 28, 2018, 12:29:47 PM »
I don't think that's what he's aiming for. He's more likely to be taking a "deplatforming" approach and wants us to condemn the people he's decided were likely to have played a role in instigating the violence,  unknowingly or otherwise.

Reasonable man standards evidently now are supposed to hold a speaker accountable for the acts of insane listeners.

Crunch

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #12 on: October 28, 2018, 01:58:19 PM »
That’s very much part of it. But I point to the exit question, “So, any condemnations of this ideology from Republicans?”

The condemnation is so pervasive that it’s impossible he missed it. Of course he wants dissenting idea suppressed but he also wants us and Republicans to confess that the ideas that led to his beliefs that it drives these acts were violations. Those to be held accountable are the one being sent to metaphorical camps via deplatforming. But first, we need to confess to the crimes so the punishment will be just and fair.

It’s classic totalitarianism.

TheDrake

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #13 on: October 28, 2018, 03:26:54 PM »
Sinn Fein had many troubles. They could condemn the acts of the IRA until they turned blue, but as long as they advocated the same goals and expressed sympathy for the ideals, no condemnation would have been good enough. Democrats have a problem with Antifa. When they condemn a speaker and call for opposition, it won't be good enough for some that they condemn violent acts. Likewise with Republicans and white nationalists.

Grant

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #14 on: October 28, 2018, 03:43:04 PM »
Sinn Fein had many troubles. They could condemn the acts of the IRA until they turned blue, but as long as they advocated the same goals and expressed sympathy for the ideals, no condemnation would have been good enough. Democrats have a problem with Antifa. When they condemn a speaker and call for opposition, it won't be good enough for some that they condemn violent acts. Likewise with Republicans and white nationalists.

I'm uncertain if you are stating that the condemnation of violent actors, or violent organizations, by individuals and organizations that share the same policy goals, but in a non-violent manner, will simply never be good enough in the eyes of the those opposed, or if they are prima facie, not good enough period. 

TheDrake

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #15 on: October 28, 2018, 05:53:22 PM »
In the eyes of those opposed. They wouldn't be satisfied unless they repudiated opposition itself.

TheDeamon

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #16 on: October 28, 2018, 07:01:44 PM »
In the eyes of those opposed. They wouldn't be satisfied unless they repudiated opposition itself.

I have to admit to some small hypocrisy on that count. But 100% agreed on that one, both ironically and unironically.

Greg Davidson

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #17 on: October 29, 2018, 12:55:02 AM »
Quote
It's a systemic problem.  Conservatives sometimes do it, and so do Liberals.  There is plenty of blame to go around.

But do they? Can you name a Democratic President who has incited crowds to see the press as the enemy of the people? Or to urge crowds to lock up political opponents? We have Fox News promoting anti-Semitic conspiracies like George Soros running the State Department (Soros figures like Emmanuel Goldstein in Orwell's 1984, a designated hate figure on the right even though his political contributions are small relative to those of conservatives such as Sheldon Adelson or the Koch Brothers). After the bombings (are you sure they were fake?), any decent human being as President would have called those who had been targeted for assassination, and would not be campaigning the next day, and would not be attacking one of the intended victims in his speeches (as a matter of fact, any decent human being would not justify continuing to campaign by lying that the Stock Market opened the day after 9/11, as President Trump has done).

The claim of "both sides do it the same, so it doesn't matter" is false. There's no President who has acted like this in our lifetimes  in the United States.   

Grant, I was all willing to give you kudos for condemning specific inciting bigotry and hatred resulting in attempted and completed murders in your underlined text, but as I read it, you just can't do it.

Fenring

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #18 on: October 29, 2018, 01:12:53 AM »
Greg, don't you think there's a potential conflict of interest at play here? And as I say this I recognize that a conflict of interest doesn't negate that there may be principles at stake that don't care about interests. But anyhow: when you compare these conservative things to the idea of Muslims being expected to condemn Muslims violence/hate/terrorism, I don't think these map on to each other cleanly. For a Muslim who claims to be all about peace, one would think that a Muslim preaching and acting out violence would be anathema to them; that such a person is antagonistic to their religion's belief. So objectively one would think that the peaceful Muslims wouldn't see terrorists as being intelligibly "on their side" in any meaningful way, and therefore would have no stake in protecting or apologizing for them. Now of course, there are potential repercussions to a Muslim breaking ranks, and so if anything we'd expect a lack of denouncing to perhaps be explained away by fear rather than disagreement (if we take their peaceful claims at face value).

In the case of conservatives, on the other hand, it hardly seem equivalent to ask a conservative to denounce someone (or agents) that actually do sort of fight for their beliefs, or at least nominally accept similar political principles, but that happen to be bad actors. If Trump, for instance, will fight for political things that appeal to conservatives, even if he's hateful in other ways it remains that denouncing him basically results in fighting against their material interests in some way. Anything that helps "the other side" is more hateful than the bad actor himself in most cases; by speaking the truth (assuming they agree with you on the bad things) harms their political position. This shouldn't be the case with a religious people who are asked to denounce people who actually harm their religion and destroy its credibility. I guess you could argue that Trump harms conservatism and destroys its credibility too, and yet the way the American system works you're stuck with the leads you've got and it's largely more important that your party is in power than that a decent guy is representing it. Fight against the guy and you're sorting of fighting against the party too. And so again we're not likely to see people agree to argue against their own interests, even if in principle you're right and the conservatives even agree with you to an extent. That's one of the many reasons why I think a party system is largely harmful to government; people vote through selfish interest rather than heart-felt honest reflection. And it's not like this is some kind of surprise, either; Plato as much as said this would obviously happen.

I know you're sort of ironically calling BS on the "why don't Muslims reject extremism" line, maybe more so than really expecting conservative support on this issue; but maybe the real issue here is conflicts of interest more so than whether people agree that Trump is dumb. I think you'd get more support proposing that people are forced to vote for their interests rather than their principles, and that the partisan atmosphere is responsible for this. Wouldn't part of the solution be to find things in common with conservatives, rather than to call our hypocrisy? (even if you're 100% accurate in your accusations)

TheDrake

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #19 on: October 29, 2018, 06:47:38 AM »
I hate trump and what he's doing. But I also see maxine waters putting fuel on the fire. And outside of the politicians who are more polished and under control, I can't count how many have expressed a wish to see trump die. That includes entertainers, activists, rank and file.

Crunch

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #20 on: October 29, 2018, 08:14:43 AM »
Quote
It's a systemic problem.  Conservatives sometimes do it, and so do Liberals.  There is plenty of blame to go around.

But do they? Can you name a Democratic President who has incited crowds to see the press as the enemy of the people? Or to urge crowds to lock up political opponents?
Obama did ”War on Fox News”.  “We’re going to treat them the way we would an opponent,” Anita Dunn, the communications director, told The New York Times.


We have Fox News promoting anti-Semitic conspiracies like George Soros running the State Department (Soros figures like Emmanuel Goldstein in Orwell's 1984, a designated hate figure on the right even though his political contributions are small relative to those of conservatives such as Sheldon Adelson or the Koch Brothers). After the bombings (are you sure they were fake?), any decent human being as President would have called those who had been targeted for assassination, and would not be campaigning the next day, and would not be attacking one of the intended victims in his speeches (as a matter of fact, any decent human being would not justify continuing to campaign by lying that the Stock Market opened the day after 9/11, as President Trump has done).
See, you still wage that war.


The claim of "both sides do it the same, so it doesn't matter" is false. There's no President who has acted like this in our lifetimes  in the United States.   
Now that I’ve definitively proven that the prior president acted exactly like this and that you followed your orders to continue the attack, I look forward to you ignoring it and pretending your claims are true.  :o

Grant, I was all willing to give you kudos for condemning specific inciting bigotry and hatred resulting in attempted and completed murders in your underlined text, but as I read it, you just can't do it.
What did I tell you guys? He doesn’t want you to condemn anything. He wants you to confess.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2018, 08:20:24 AM by Crunch »

TheDrake

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #21 on: October 29, 2018, 08:52:47 AM »
Exactly like what? HE didn't use rhetoric like enemy, he used opposition. HE didn't say anything, he said it through his press secretary. HE didn't talk about fox news in a pseudo campaign rally that fox news reporters were covering. HE didn't tweet about fox news being fake.

So if you're going to use a word like "exactly" I'm going to call you on that one. It's like saying that chamber music is exactly like death metal because they are both music.

Seriati

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #22 on: October 29, 2018, 09:44:25 AM »
Conservatives often claim that they don't hear Muslims properly condemn the ideology of hatred that inspires acts of terrorism by Islamic extremists.

"Conservative" is not a religion.  Religions require adoption of a collective belief, Islam more than most. 

The fact that someone self identifies as liberal or conservative doesn't make anyone else responsible for them or their actions. 

To be clear.  I condemn anti-semitism and racism and white nationalism.  People who hold to those abhorent beliefs have no party, because there is no American polity that approves of their desires in sufficient numbers to give them a party.  I don't particularly care which party they self identify with, and for the record, all of the open racists I have known in my life have been Democrats.  The fact is there is no policy of the "conservative" movement that you can point to that is anti-semitic or racist, or you already would. 

So call it out.  What policy or view are you asking to be condemned?  Racism, 99% of the country does.  Anti-Semitism, vast majority does (though there's a divide on whether open hatred of Israel that exists in the D party is legitimately anti-semitism or just anti-country (completely divorced from who happens to control that country)).

Quote
Wednesday - A shooter attempts to get into a black church, when that fails he goes into a Kroeger's and executes two African Americans but tells a white guy "whites don't shoot whites"

Racists have no party, are morons and are contemptible.  Ones who would kill black people are crazy on top of that.  Now what top three racist positions are you asking us to reject?

Quote
Friday - The largest number of simultaneous political assassination attempts in American history, with the targets being those identified by the President, Fox News, and the right-wing media as enemies of the people

Mail bombers, and apparently mail fake bombers, are contemptible.  Now what are the policy positions of mail bombers that you want us to condemn?  They seem to often be anarchists rather than "conservatives" but I'm willing to listen.

Quote
Saturday - Pittsburgh shooter, echoing the narrative from the President, Fox News, and the right-wing media about Jews bringing in "hostile invaders to dwell among us?", kills 11 Americans at a Synagogue.

Anti-semites are repugnant and should be condemned by all.  Now what positions are they advocating that you think are in the "conservative" platform (keeping in mind that the conservatives tend to be rock solid on support of Israel and believe the Jews to be the chosen people of their god).

Quote
Under President Trump, the US government-supported Radio Marti put out a program five months ago attacking George Soros as  “multimillionaire Jew” and “the architect of the financial collapse of 2008.”  Soros was one of the targets of Friday's assassination attempts

Anti-Oligarchs?  Lol, have you retracted every condemnation of the Kochs you ever wrote?  I think the fact that we have election finance laws that prevent "anyone" from contributing more than $10k dollar to a campaign, yet these - men - manage to contribute hundreds of millions a bit shocking.  In any event, Soros is in a special category as - to my knowledge - he's the only one in the club that has been actively accused by other countries of fomenting rebellions.  I see no reason to believe the leopard has changed his spots in his interactions with this country.

In any event, have you repudiated the 1% movement?  It's the fundamental philosophy behind anti-oligarchism.

Quote
So, any condemnations of this ideology from Republicans?

Well yes literally they all condemned them. 

Or do you mean, did the Republicans condemn their legitimate positions on things like immigration?  Or that the press should report the facts rather than spin everything to support a particular political position (oh my god, can you even imagine how the left would react if the shoe was on the other foot)? 

Be specific, which ideology are you asking be condemned, because the prime motivator behind each of this attack is not an accepted part of any major political group's ideology.  Implying otherwise, is pretty much just a self serving lie.

D.W.

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #23 on: October 29, 2018, 09:48:41 AM »
Quote
As Cherry asked, what is it exactly we're supposed to be condemning
This is why I expect Greg asked the question as he did rather than make an accusation for others to refute of hypocrisy. 
This is how people SHOULD respond to acts of political violence that is being claimed to represent a larger group.  It IS absurd that the whole group must now accept blame for their “crazies”.  To ask that larger group to denounce the fringe wack jobs is a political move designed to smear the larger group.  Stop doing it…  Greg made his point.  Try to learn the lesson moving forward.

rightleft22

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #24 on: October 29, 2018, 10:10:25 AM »
Quote
Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?

Because it would require everyone to face their shadow and take responsibility for it. Not going to happen.
Its easier to project and maintain the Us verses Them, the scary Other, which is more useful tool to exploit.

Seriati

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #25 on: October 29, 2018, 10:14:00 AM »
But do they? Can you name a Democratic President who has incited crowds to see the press as the enemy of the people?

As Cherry pointed out, Obama certainly labelled Fox News as fake.  But I'd also refresh your memory that the Clinton's were incredibly fond of claiming that it was a "vast right wing conspiracy" to make them look bad as new stories came out.  It wasn't nearly as express, but it's certainly the ideological pre-cursor of undermining the legitimacy of press stories, which Trump has taken further to undermine the press itself.  But honestly, Trump has far more cause with the press that has literally engaged in an unprecedented, in modern times, level of bias against him, including burying stories and publishing rumor.

Quote
Or to urge crowds to lock up political opponents?

You'll have to refresh me on this one.  Far as I know Trump has never urged a crowd to lock up his political opponents.  Are you deliberately misconstruing a call to apply the law evenly to Clinton and lock her up?  That would be prosecutors, not a crowd, doing so.  Or did I miss a call somewhere to have a crowd grab someone illegally and detain them?

Quote
We have Fox News promoting anti-Semitic conspiracies like George Soros running the State Department (Soros figures like Emmanuel Goldstein in Orwell's 1984, a designated hate figure on the right even though his political contributions are small relative to those of conservatives such as Sheldon Adelson or the Koch Brothers).

It's grossly misleading to call Anti-Soros activism anit-Semitic.  I don't think anyone cares about his religion, they care about his massive funding of bad policies and poorer candidates.   I'm not an expert on how much exactly each of them has contributed relative to each other (and I wonder how you are), can you break it down, Soros has been incredibly active in political influencing groups that aren't directly reported as campaign contributions.

Quote
After the bombings (are you sure they were fake?), any decent human being as President would have called those who had been targeted for assassination, and would not be campaigning the next day,

I assume that he didn't call them, is that a claim that someone made?

Given that the media and the left immediately started campaigning on the issue, why would you expect the President to stop?  This kind of event has every indication of causing major voting impact in a manner that really isn't warranted.  It's the same kind of effect as an October surprise with a temporary change in voting patterns.  Not campaigning now would rob those who need to consider the real issues that are facing our country and the real arguments on the "October" issues more than emotional and hasty reactions from hearing about the other side and being reminded about it.

Honestly, you really think it's reasonable to have a rule of thumb that "one side" has to back out of campaigning two weeks before an election? 

If these had been anti-fa crazies would you be on here calling for the left to stay off the campaign trail?  No, you'd be on here claiming that it was Trump's fault for creating a climate of hate and calling for him to stay home.

Quote
The claim of "both sides do it the same, so it doesn't matter" is false.

I agree, the left is overwhelmingly at fault for the level of increased hate in the last two years, for stoking the fires and for encouraging their base to take it a personal level.

Quote
There's no President who has acted like this in our lifetimes  in the United States.

I agree with this too.  I'll go further, there are no major Republicans that have acted like this before, the same can not be said of the Democrats.

In other news, remember how you called out voters in Alabama and insist they vote for Doug Jones against their own voting interests, because its the right thing to do.  And in fact they put him in place, which almost cost them on issues they do care about?  Are you going to call out the DNC in NJ whose doubled down and doubled down again on supporting Menendez - the claims against are more proven, and also include sex with underage girls - well really prostitutes - not to mention corruption and bribery?  The ads they are running now are overwhelmingly calls to real politic - vote him in to stop Trump.

Seriati

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #26 on: October 29, 2018, 10:16:22 AM »
Quote
Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?

Because it would require everyone to face their shadow and take responsibility for it. Not going to happen.
Its easier to project and maintain the Us verses Them, the scary Other, which is more useful tool to exploit.

Honestly, RL if you can find a conservative terrorist organization I'd be happy to condemn them.  Labeling people "right wing" when they have nothing in common with the people on the right doesn't give me an incentive to "own them" then condemn them.

TheDeamon

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #27 on: October 29, 2018, 10:58:24 AM »
Exactly like what? HE didn't use rhetoric like enemy, he used opposition. HE didn't say anything, he said it through his press secretary. HE didn't talk about fox news in a pseudo campaign rally that fox news reporters were covering. HE didn't tweet about fox news being fake.

So if you're going to use a word like "exactly" I'm going to call you on that one. It's like saying that chamber music is exactly like death metal because they are both music.

Uh, Obama straight up said "Fox News isn't actually news." (In fairness, he was more alluding to their afternoon/Prime Time lineups which were largely opinion segments.) At least I have clear recall of that soundbite being him.

rightleft22

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #28 on: October 29, 2018, 11:49:47 AM »
I actually don't like the uses of the label 'terrorist' when it comes to extreme ideology (left or right)
My comment was intended for both sides not being able to acknowledge or take steps to illuminate their blind spots.
It doesn't serve their immediate needs to do so.

I don't see this changing anytime soon. At least not until the shadow slaps us/them in the face and kicks us/them in the balls. At least historically that what usually happens... and then we go to sleep again, repeat. 

TheDrake

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #29 on: October 29, 2018, 11:59:59 AM »
Uh, Obama straight up said "Fox News isn't actually news." (In fairness, he was more alluding to their afternoon/Prime Time lineups which were largely opinion segments.) At least I have clear recall of that soundbite being him.

And you don't see the difference between that and calling them enemies? Or praising a congressman that assaulted a reporter? "any guy who can do a body slam ... he's my guy"? Or reveling in a crowd chanting "CNN Sucks"?

Seriati

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #30 on: October 29, 2018, 12:01:15 PM »
But rightleft22 my response was to point out that racism and anti-semitism are not my "blind spots" nor are they the "blindspots" of conservatives generally.  I'm asking that if you want to make a charge you make it specifically and not backpedal into generalities that assume the truth of the charge you are trying to make.

TheDeamon

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #31 on: October 29, 2018, 12:08:19 PM »
I actually don't like the uses of the label 'terrorist' when it comes to extreme ideology (left or right)
My comment was intended for both sides not being able to acknowledge or take steps to illuminate their blind spots.
It doesn't serve their immediate needs to do so.

I don't see this changing anytime soon. At least not until the shadow slaps us/them in the face and kicks us/them in the balls. At least historically that what usually happens... and then we go to sleep again, repeat.

Most of us in here are aware of those "blind spots" to  varying degrees, which isn't to say we don't fall into them from time to time, but I'd like to think we're more aware than most.

That said, "the masses" remain largely oblivious, and they're likely going to continue doing what you're complaining about for a long time to come. At least until something comes along and forces them to wake up to what they're doing. That said, the methods of doing so("waking them up") are wildly variable, and the favored methods by many actors are actually wildly ineffective, and usually only serves to make that "blind spot" problem worse for everybody involved.

Pete at Home

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #32 on: October 29, 2018, 12:25:09 PM »
Conservatives often claim that they don't hear Muslims properly condemn the ideology of hatred that inspires acts of terrorism by Islamic extremists.

Could you please quote that?  Because that sort of fuzzy attribution seems to be the trick by which you lead us down the garden path to claiming that believing that Soros was the architect of ecomonic collapse is a "terrorist ideology."  I have no idea if Soros caused the economic collapse, but one should be able to discuss that question without being linked to an attempted murder.

To emphasize the bleeding obvious, Terrorism is an act, not a fracking ideology.

John Brown committed terrorism and there was nothing wrong with his ideology.

TheDrake

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #33 on: October 29, 2018, 12:39:37 PM »
Somewhat dated, but relevant.

Quote
The Sun’s leading article a week ago (17 November) began: “Here is a simple way for Muslims to denounce the monsters of IS: march through London in massive numbers with placards saying ‘not in our name.’”

It argued that Muslims had “done too little in public to express solidarity with the victims in Paris and the civilised, tolerant democracies in which they live and which IS want to destroy.”

A day later, the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) took out an advert in the national press, backed by 300 affiliate organisations, which “unreservedly” condemned the Paris attacks.

link

So, yeah, a lot of people have demanded that Muslim groups march around to prove they are not "the bad ones". Of course, the really far right organizations don't bother, because they already think all Muslims are irredeemably evil.

rightleft22

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #34 on: October 29, 2018, 12:40:50 PM »
Quote
But rightleft22 my response was to point out that racism and anti-semitism are not my "blind spots" nor are they the "blindspots" of conservatives generally

The thing with blind spots is that one does not see them. For me the above statement indicates blind spots exist because we all have them and that as TheDeamon noted we all fall into at times.

I never thought I was racist however I've done and said racists things. Sure most came from place of ignorance however I'm not sure that qualification matters to those on the receiving end.  I like to think that I did better when I learned better.

The statement - Because it would require everyone to face their shadow and take responsibility for it - did not imply that anyone on this forums blind spot was racism or extreme Ideology.

Question is antisemitism racism? if so what why is it  added as a separate category as in "racism and antisemitism"?

D.W.

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #35 on: October 29, 2018, 01:13:52 PM »
It's always a tricky one when heritage AND religion are intertwined.  I think even people belonging to that group are going to have differing views on who can and cannot rightfully claim that title. 

What hope do those on the outside have for making the differentiation?  My impression leans more towards racial lines than religious when it comes to antisemitism.  Though I've not actually looked into the topic much.

Crunch

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #36 on: October 29, 2018, 01:41:24 PM »
Uh, Obama straight up said "Fox News isn't actually news." (In fairness, he was more alluding to their afternoon/Prime Time lineups which were largely opinion segments.) At least I have clear recall of that soundbite being him.

And you don't see the difference between that and calling them enemies? Or praising a congressman that assaulted a reporter? "any guy who can do a body slam ... he's my guy"? Or reveling in a crowd chanting "CNN Sucks"?

Your argument is about splitting hairs and rests upon the idea that the spokesperson for Obama is not really representativeness Obama. Trump called them An enemy, Obama says they’re an opponent and then used the DOJ on the media (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_articles_about_the_Department_of_Justice_investigations_of_reporters). So no, there’s no real material difference between what they said no matter how much you want to pretend there is but there’s actually quite a gap between what they do about it - Obama acted to use the force of government. Big difference I’d say.

Enjoying the CNN sucks chant? So what? CNN has long since left journalism behind them and engaged in activism against Trump. CNN long ago went in the tank for the left and Trump should enjoy their discomfort over being exposed as a propaganda machine instead of a news source.

As for the body slam thing, you need to stop relying on these propaganda outlets to tell you what hat to think. That was a joke, one made at the congressman’s expense in the same way guys give each other a hard time. If you look at the entire thing in context, you’ll see that it’s just like the joke about Russia and Hillary’s emails.

Seriati

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #37 on: October 29, 2018, 01:46:53 PM »
Quote
But rightleft22 my response was to point out that racism and anti-semitism are not my "blind spots" nor are they the "blindspots" of conservatives generally

The thing with blind spots is that one does not see them. For me the above statement indicates blind spots exist because we all have them and that as TheDeamon noted we all fall into at times.

I see, so the "proof" that I don't have racist and anti-semitic blind spots is that I don't believe I do?  That's literal kafkatrapping nonsense.

How about, you demonstrate where a position I am taking is done for racist and/or anti-semitic reasons, which is how a legitimate case would be made.

My point is that you've misidentified someone else's blindspots.  Which is itself a soft form of abuse.

rightleft22

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #38 on: October 29, 2018, 03:04:15 PM »
Yeah its a catch 22  you don't know what you don't know and only you know what you know about your true intentions, motivations and fears and only if your constantly checking in them will you notice when you come up short.

Quote
How about, you demonstrate where a position I am taking is done for racist and/or anti-semitic reasons,
I don't think I have ever tried to make a case to indicate your position our you yourself are racist...  I might have suggested in the past that I thought some of your positions were hypocritical. (I am aware that many of my own arguments have been hypocritical. Its one of the reasons I post. )

I don't always agree with your positions and do sometimes think that your over identified with the GOP cause which only means that you can be counted on to defend petty much most of what the party is doing but that doesn't make you racist or necessarily blind to that.

We are living in a time of history where, IMO, we are regressing and becoming more likely to lock in our view point with out being open to learning. Thus IMO neither "side" will flat out denounce ideology that my go to far. Instead it is most likely they will excuse it and water it down so that its acceptable to them.  The evangelicals are a good example as is the current trend on the far extremes to create conspiracy theories. Fox and other media sources handling of the mail bomb story and arguing false flag conspiracy is another example (which I predicted).

 
It is my prejudice that I think the extreme far right (in general not you personal - I don't consider you extreme far right) is more likely to engage in conspiracy theory to avoid looking more closely at their ideology - or maybe just better at it. 
« Last Edit: October 29, 2018, 03:07:41 PM by rightleft22 »

Crunch

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #39 on: October 29, 2018, 03:55:26 PM »
It is my prejudice that I think the extreme far right (in general not you personal - I don't consider you extreme far right) is more likely to engage in conspiracy theory to avoid looking more closely at their ideology - or maybe just better at it.

I think it's at least as likely - Russian collusion, Kavanaugh ran a rape gang, the "vast right wing conspiracy" after the Clinton's, etc. The left's conspiracy theories are covered and treated as real rather than being dismissed as conspiracy theory so it may appear that the right is more engaged in such theories.

TheDeamon

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #40 on: October 29, 2018, 04:41:42 PM »
It is my prejudice that I think the extreme far right (in general not you personal - I don't consider you extreme far right) is more likely to engage in conspiracy theory to avoid looking more closely at their ideology - or maybe just better at it.

For how I'd prefer to define the right wing several people in here, myself included, probably run into that side of the spectrum.

Of course, that places most of the racists and a lot of the tin-foil hat crowd "to the left" of us. I say this because a lot of posters on here seem to slant libertarian to various degrees, although they may more broadly belong on the Conservative or Moderate end of the spectrum.

In reality the only thing "more right wing than a Libertarian" is an Anarchist(or Anarco-Capitalist as one member of this forum pegged it).

Racial supremacy agendas, National Socialist agenda items, and so on? They have no place on a spectrum running from "the center" of American Politics if it runs through Libertarianism in a straight line. That only happens if you turn around and start heading off in a different direction.

rightleft22

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #41 on: October 29, 2018, 04:55:56 PM »
Quote
The left's conspiracy theories are covered and treated as real

I guess its in the eye of the beholder. In the coverage I watched concerning Kavanaugh I never heard the one about the Russian rape gang.
With regards to Russian collusion I've been able to identify News from opinion, speculation and editorial. pretty sure

I suspect that if you were to go far enough to the right and far enough to the left you end up in the same place :0 

« Last Edit: October 29, 2018, 04:59:19 PM by rightleft22 »

TheDeamon

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #42 on: October 29, 2018, 06:14:02 PM »
Yes and no. Libertarians inevitably end up in a kind of weirdly ordered state of Anarchy. Even socialists eventually default to a quasi state of Anarchy.

Arguably Marxism should end up there as well, although it typically becomes "a means to an end." Which Stalinism exemplifies, you overthrow a "Capitalist regime" by devolving things into a state of Anarchy and use that period of chaos ("The Revolution"--a construct from Marx as I understand it) to impose Communistic Order upon the masses.

I guess the Nazis would be a Socialist variant of a Stalinist.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2018, 06:21:11 PM by TheDeamon »

TheDrake

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #43 on: October 29, 2018, 06:48:31 PM »
The libertarians themselves demand more than one-dimensional politics. To call them on the far right wing is to ignore social policy. The American Right usually identifies as anti-abortion, in favor of drug prohibition, pro LGBT rights, and maybe most importantly favor isolationist foreign policy.

Oh and this too from lp.org:

Quote
Libertarians do not support classifying undocumented immigrants as criminals. Our current immigration system is an embarrassment. People who would like to follow the legal procedures are unable to because these procedures are so complex and expensive and lengthy. If Americans want immigrants to enter through legal channels, we need to make those channels fair, reasonable, and accessible.

But a lot of libertarians do enjoy themselves some conspiracy theories.

TheDeamon

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #44 on: October 30, 2018, 01:41:38 AM »
Don't confuse the Libertarian Party with Libertarianism, yes the two overlap to a large degree, but they are not one and the same.

Much like the Republican Party doesn't define Conservativism, or how the Democratic Party doesn't define Liberalism, no matter how much both parties wish they could.

TheDrake

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #45 on: October 30, 2018, 07:23:55 AM »
Quote
As for the body slam thing, you need to stop relying on these propaganda outlets to tell you what hat to think. That was a joke, one made at the congressman’s expense in the same way guys give each other a hard time. If you look at the entire thing in context, you’ll see that it’s just like the joke about Russia and Hillary’s emails.

Wasn't it also a joke at the victim's expense? Trump consistently projects the idea here and elsewhere that:

1. On some level at least, the victim deserves violence.
2. The violent act is somewhere on the level of jaywalking.

"If you see somebody getting ready to throw a tomato, knock the crap out of them."
"Maybe he should've been roughed up,"
“Like when you guys put somebody in the car and you’re protecting their head, you know, the way you put your hand over it. Like, don’t hit their head, and they’ve just killed somebody. I said, you can take the hand away, O.K.?.”
 "He's walking out with big high-fives, smiling, laughing," Trump said. "I'd like to punch him in the face, I'll tell you."
"Try not to hurt him. If you do, I'll defend you in court. Don't worry about it."

You're right, it is very different from obtaining a subpoena, overseen by a judge, to search some records regarding a national security matter.

Do you think Trump would be kidding around about a body slam if it had been done to a veteran? What if a Democrat candidate had body slammed a MAGA wearing Trump supporter? He clearly couldn't care less if a reporter or a criminal suspect or a protester (against him) is acted against in a violent way.

As far as the CNN sucks chant, I'm just pointing out that Obama didn't lead a Fox Sucks chant or nod approvingly during one. He stated flat out that he thought they sucked (with a level of appropriate indirection), but he didn't whip his base into a frenzy and then wink and nod when a Fox reporter got thrown to the ground by a member of the Democratic party.

rightleft22

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #46 on: October 30, 2018, 12:26:01 PM »
Quote
As for the body slam thing, you need to stop relying on these propaganda outlets to tell you what hat to think. That was a joke

It was a joke but it wasn't at the congressmen expense. I've seen the clip and there is no way history is going to side with you on that one. 

Seriati

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #47 on: October 30, 2018, 04:04:34 PM »
In other news, remember how you called out voters in Alabama and insist they vote for Doug Jones against their own voting interests, because its the right thing to do.  And in fact they put him in place, which almost cost them on issues they do care about?  Are you going to call out the DNC in NJ whose doubled down and doubled down again on supporting Menendez - the claims against are more proven, and also include sex with underage girls - well really prostitutes - not to mention corruption and bribery?  The ads they are running now are overwhelmingly calls to real politic - vote him in to stop Trump.

Talk about timely, https://www.wsj.com/articles/choke-on-bob-menendez-1540853570

Seriati

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #48 on: October 30, 2018, 04:16:46 PM »
Yeah its a catch 22

It's not a catch 22, it's a KafkaTrap.  A catch 22 is a problem where no matter which path you take it's a failure, a dilemma.  A KafkaTrap, on the other hand, is an absurd charge that takes denial of the charge as proof of it.

It's a morally bankrupt style of pretend argument. 

Quote
you don't know what you don't know and only you know what you know about your true intentions, motivations and fears and only if your constantly checking in them will you notice when you come up short.

I know what my motivations are.  If you live such an unexamined life that you have taken a position and only later realized that it was for racist reasons of which you were unaware that's on you, not on me.

I'm fully aware that some decisions have a different statistical impact, I'm fully aware that some principals justify such impacts and others do not.

So be specific and lay out your case for where there is racism in a position, or anti-Semitism.  Not being able to do that, does not mean I, or anyone else has a "blindspot," it means you're making a false claim where you've assumed your conclusion.

Quote
We are living in a time of history where, IMO, we are regressing and becoming more likely to lock in our view point with out being open to learning.

My default view, is that if you don't know the other side's position well enough to understand why they are right (not just that they believe it, but well enough to understand the truth they see), you don't really understand a position well enough and shouldn't be making an argument.  The great debates are not about right and wrong, they are about better and worse.

Quote
Thus IMO neither "side" will flat out denounce ideology that my go to far.

Really?  Give me an example of the ideology on my "side" that "goes to far" and that I'm unwilling to "denounce."  So far the examples are pretty nonsensical or ones that have in fact been denounced.

Quote
The evangelicals are a good example as is the current trend on the far extremes to create conspiracy theories.

So which "evangelicals" are falling for what "conspiracy theories"? 

Quote
Fox and other media sources handling of the mail bomb story and arguing false flag conspiracy is another example (which I predicted).

Do you have an example of "arguing"?  Honestly, there was very limited speculation, the only people that I've seen "arguing" the point are random commenters on message boards.

Quote
It is my prejudice that I think the extreme far right (in general not you personal - I don't consider you extreme far right) is more likely to engage in conspiracy theory to avoid looking more closely at their ideology - or maybe just better at it.

Well I think you are grossly exaggerating.  A more accurate description is that conspiracy theorists don't examine their ideology.  Not clear to me that they are overwhelming on the right.

Crunch

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Why can't Republicans denounce the ideology of right-wing terrorists?
« Reply #49 on: October 30, 2018, 06:36:02 PM »
Quote
As for the body slam thing, you need to stop relying on these propaganda outlets to tell you what hat to think. That was a joke

It was a joke but it wasn't at the congressmen expense. I've seen the clip and there is no way history is going to side with you on that one.

Really? Hillary Clinton just made a joke about how all black people look alike.  You gonna call her a racist?