Giving 2 years of essentially free rein on a fake investigation into a lie is not in ANY CREDIBLE WAY doing everything in his power to obstruct.
You seem to forget. Trump KNEW ALL ALONG that there wasn't any collusion on his part. That makes his tolerance and yes patience with a politically driven witch hunt truly remarkable.
And what you forget, Seriati, was the Mueller wasn't tasked to investigate Trump on collusion. Think about that for a moment. Mueller was never specifically tasked to investigate Trump. You can read it for yourself.
What a gross retcon. Go back to pretending. Anyone who paid any attention for the last 2 years, saw a massive propaganda campaign by the media and the DNC claiming that it was Trump himself that was guilty of collusion, that he was a Russian plant and that the Mueller investigation was going to take him down.
I will not accept your gaslighting of what happened. Mueller's specific mandate has never been clearly and fully laid out. And your "current interpretation" bears no resemblance to that which was being bandied about.
So when Trump said the whole investigation was a "witch hunt," he wasn't talking only about himself. He was talking about his whole team. Everyone involved in the campaign. And he couldn't have known, 100 percent, that they were all squeaky-clean.
He wouldn't have to know that. I guarantee there are criminals involved in his campaign and in Hillary's campaign. They are both massive groups of extreme partisans with numerous people of questionable ethics. SO are all campaigns.
Not finding collusion against that backdrop is a major faceplant.
So when Trump knew he hadn't colluded with the Russians, that justifies him calling any investigation into whether anyone in his campaign colluded with the Russians "a witch hunt?"
Yes. Unless there was evidence - WHICH WE HAVE NEVER SEEN - this was an investigation looking for a crime, not an investigation of a crime. That is exactly what's meant by a witch hunt.
Even investigating one crime as a pretext to investigating something that you have no evidence of is a witch hunt.
This basic civics. Our government is required to have a reasonable suspicion that there was a crime to investigate.
My god, the whole reason this was run as a counter-intelligence operation seems to have been so they could violate the civil rights of members of the opposition party without any evidence of a crime in hopes that they could find a crime to retroactively justify the investigation.
Civil liberties have no place in the modern left.
That since he was "clean," then his entire staff must have been "clean," also, and anyone who thought otherwise is automatically a "TRAITOR?"
I don't care what you thought or anyone else. I do care that someone seems to have abused the powers of the government for political purposes. And yes, they are potentially traitors here.
If you think that is "tolerance," I would hate to see what you consider "intolerance." 
I have no tolerance for corruption. I'm beginning to think you do, so long as it's going the correct direction.