If they do their due diligence, then I got no problem with them. To your point, I think we should have them submitted (probably to the SOS) for verification, and fund them sufficient to do so.
But as I first stated, there was nothing in the initial report stating one way or the other, if this company had done even that. The U.S. attorney even threatened other places employing illegally.
I just find it ridiculous that with few exceptions, this aspect of the immigration issue is ignored. Remove the incentive and you either, A) significantly reduce illegal crossings, or B) swiftly gain support to reform immigration policy to get us the workers needed to run our economy. Both things each side claim to want.