...targeted 52 Iranian sites (representing the 52 American hostages taken by Iran many years ago), some at a very high level & important to Iran & the Iranian culture, and those targets, and Iran itself, WILL BE HIT VERY FAST AND VERY HARD. The USA wants no more threats!
Nothing like threatening war crimes to deescalate a situation.
What war crime would that be?
Directing unlawful attacks against sites and buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science or charitable purposes, or historic monuments. Check out U.N. Resolution 2347, which was written specifically to condemn ISIS destruction of heritage sites, and passed unanimously by the U.N. Security Council.
Which sites are those that are on Trump's list of targets?
So are you saying, Seriati, that after assassinating Iran's #2 leader (or at least someone in the top 10), which brought out tens of thousands of mourners into the streets, and causing the Iranian government to vow revenge, that maybe Trump is simply threatening to take out a road-side marker to keep them from retaliating?

If they aren't
significant cultural targets, then why bother?
And if they are significant, what makes you believe that none of them will rise to the level of those protected by Resolution 2347?
Speculation is not evidence of a war crime.
No, I haven't accused him of any war crimes, yet. As the original post said, he is
threatening to commit war crimes. Threatening to take out Iranian cultural targets.
You guys haven't been paying attention. There are several mind readers on this forum. They know his inner thoughts and motivation for every decision he makes, sometimes even before he does.
Since when has reading someone's words and trying to understand what they mean reach the level of reading someone's mind? That's what words are supposed to be for, aren't they? To communicate to other people know what you are thinking.

Besides, no Democrats believes you can read Trump's mind. You can't read something that doesn't exist.
