Does it bother anyone about how the laptop has been reported to have been attained, The chain of custody?
Yes.
No. Hunter brought the laptop to Mac Isaac and signed the receipt that had the caveat that unpicked up, unpaid items become the property of the repairman. Hunter returned a second time and brought in a keypad that he also signed for, then he vanished and would not respond to Isaac's attempts to contact him. After awhile Isaacs became concerned with all the news about Hunter and Joe being involved in scandal, so he copied the hard drive and brought the original to the FBI, where they opened an investigation. (Chain of evidence is the doctrine in law that allows arsonists to escape being proved guilty, when the firemen come into a burning building and overhaul a fire. They toss any flammables out the window, which breaks the chain of evidence so they can't later be checked for fingerprints and admitted as evidence. Isaac maintained control of all items, so everything is admissible.)
Is Rudy a reliable narrator?
No.
Yes, He is a former prosecutor, with great experience, besides being "America's Mayor." When the FBI warned Isaac that he should "keep quiet or else put himself in danger" he went to wherever he could assume protection, which ended up being Rudy's legal staff.
Those who believe Hunter and so Joe are guilty fear that it makes Joe vulnerable to blackmail or undue influence from foreign powers.
Yet the same people are not concerned at all of Trump's vulnerability to blackmail and undue influence.
-- he owes 300+ million to unknown foreign entities
-- He never separated himself from his business interests which foreign entities and various corporations have "donated" to the tune of a billion +
Or that Trump has continued to refuse to release his tax returns. Did you see him in the debate last night? What a little cry baby about how unfair the IRS is to him. He could release his returns but he is choosing not to. Nothing about being audited precludes public disclosure.
In actuality, there are no secret Chinese bank accounts. Trump was an international businessman, and as he did explain in the debate, he had an account in China for his business use, which he closed in 2015. It is Biden who got money from China with no transparency.
There are also no problems with any tax returns. Trump did turn over in-depth financial records. There is no law that says he must turn over the thousands of private business records that has accumulated. There is an audit, and his expensive legal representatives told him not to open up any documents he is not required to. He also acknowledged in the debate that although the MSM said he only paid $750 dollars in taxes, he actually paid millions of dollars. Separate verification shows he paid over a million dollars for tax in 2016, and over three million dollars in 2017. The $750 was a filing fee.
Question: has Biden filed anything on the graft he received (and verified) by Russia, China, and other foreign nations?