Author Topic: Dem debates  (Read 19741 times)

ScottF

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #50 on: January 15, 2020, 05:43:43 PM »
Quote
I think the argument is that the DNC runs CNN.

Money runs CNN.
Where Fox aims for the GOP audience CNN aims for the DNC audience.
Both the GOP and DNC manipulate that business plan as best they can for their own ends.
The majority of air time on both CNN and Fox does not qualify as news

If it was purely money they would simply shift their perspective to the right to try and get within sniffing distance of Fox ratings (ie advertising $).

TheDeamon

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #51 on: January 15, 2020, 11:08:34 PM »
If it was purely money they would simply shift their perspective to the right to try and get within sniffing distance of Fox ratings (ie advertising $).

Yes, but no. Left-wits have enough boycott threats against Fox News that they don't rely overly much on "traditional advertising" models like every other network out there, be it news, sports, TNT, or TLC. That's why you see so many ads offering to sell you gold on Fox News, but rarely see a major airline or companies like GE advertising on Fox. But will find them on CNN, MSNBC, etc without even trying.

Crunch

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #52 on: January 16, 2020, 07:34:48 AM »
It’s not that the DNC runs CNN but that they are deeply aligned with CNN willingly assisting the DNC in achieving the DNC’s goals.

This can be seen in CNN’s leaking of debate questions to Hillary, helping her prepare for a debate to the recent debate where it tried to take down Bernie yet again. Last nights reveal of the “off mike” conversation between Bernie and Warren cements that effort. The DNC doesn’t want Bernie to get the nomination, that is very clear. CNN has always been willing to help.

Look at any of the CNN talent’s social media output and you’ll see they are lockstep in line with the DNC.

Pete at Home

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #53 on: January 16, 2020, 09:51:45 AM »
It’s not that the DNC runs CNN but that they are deeply aligned with CNN willingly assisting the DNC in achieving the DNC’s goals.

This can be seen in CNN’s leaking of debate questions to Hillary, helping her prepare for a debate to the recent debate where it tried to take down Bernie yet again. Last nights reveal of the “off mike” conversation between Bernie and Warren cements that effort. The DNC doesn’t want Bernie to get the nomination, that is very clear. CNN has always been willing to help.

Look at any of the CNN talent’s social media output and you’ll see they are lockstep in line with the DNC.

I thought that the private convo after made Warren look bad and Bernie look honest and friendly.

ScottF

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #54 on: January 16, 2020, 10:18:43 AM »
It’s not that the DNC runs CNN but that they are deeply aligned with CNN willingly assisting the DNC in achieving the DNC’s goals.

This can be seen in CNN’s leaking of debate questions to Hillary, helping her prepare for a debate to the recent debate where it tried to take down Bernie yet again. Last nights reveal of the “off mike” conversation between Bernie and Warren cements that effort. The DNC doesn’t want Bernie to get the nomination, that is very clear. CNN has always been willing to help.

Look at any of the CNN talent’s social media output and you’ll see they are lockstep in line with the DNC.

I thought that the private convo after made Warren look bad and Bernie look honest and friendly.

Honestly that, along with Warren's no-hesitation response in the original exchange where the CNN moderator ignored Bernie's denial looked 100% scripted. Bernie doesn't stand a chance when his own party's state-sponsored media wants him gone.

I thought Van Jones had some interesting comments when he said that none of them looked compelling and that the DNC was missing the boat by excluding Yang.

rightleft22

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #55 on: January 16, 2020, 11:18:32 AM »
Quote
If it was purely money they would simply shift their perspective to the right to try and get within sniffing distance of Fox ratings (ie advertising $).

Fox owns the market of the right and assuming a 50 50 right/left split in politics going after the left makes money sense

The real issue is why we allow 'News' stations to operate this way.

It’s not that the DNC runs CNN but that they are deeply aligned with CNN willingly assisting the DNC in achieving the DNC’s goals.
It’s not that the GOP runs Fox but that they are deeply aligned with Fox willingly assisting the GOP in achieving the GOP goals.

So lets let this go and agree that both FOX and CNN have betrayed the peoples trust

Seriati

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #56 on: January 16, 2020, 11:39:50 AM »
Quote
If it was purely money they would simply shift their perspective to the right to try and get within sniffing distance of Fox ratings (ie advertising $).

Fox owns the market of the right and assuming a 50 50 right/left split in politics going after the left makes money sense

In what way does it "make sense" to let one player dominate half the market to enter into competition with multiple players going after the other half?  Heck even just being fair gives more potential market share than playing on the over crowded left.

Face it, you can't have journalists be overwhelming leftists and not expect that's how they're going to roll.  Money is a consideration, but it's not remotely the prime consideration in their political balance.

rightleft22

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #57 on: January 16, 2020, 02:37:40 PM »
Quote
n what way does it "make sense" to let one player dominate half the market to enter into competition with multiple players going after the other half?  Heck even just being fair gives more potential market share than playing on the over crowded left.

Face it, you can't have journalists be overwhelming leftists and not expect that's how they're going to roll.  Money is a consideration, but it's not remotely the prime consideration in their political balance

If you look at the history of Fox news the decision to cater to the right was politically and economical. As you know people are attracted to information they already 'know' and want to be true. And it worked, Fox prospered and CNN faltered. CNN could have gone after Fox viewers (right) and hire right leaning journalists or they could adopt the new practice and go after the left.

Does it make business sense?  Fox had one half of the population locked in why compete when the other half the population is up for grabs.  Low hanging fruit verses fruit hard to get at.

Lets all just forget about the self righteousness indignation we have for Fox or CNN. Any stance favoring one over the other is hypocritical

Just stop it
« Last Edit: January 16, 2020, 02:47:10 PM by rightleft22 »

rightleft22

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #58 on: January 16, 2020, 02:52:02 PM »
anyone defending CNN or Fox news are playing the fool and role of useful idiot

ScottF

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #59 on: January 16, 2020, 02:55:35 PM »
CNN could have gone after Fox viewers (right) and hire right leaning journalists or they could adopt the new practice and go after the left.

Does it make business sense?  Fox had one half of the population locked in why compete when the other half the population is up for grabs.  Low hanging fruit verses fruit hard to get at.

Except clearly it doesn't make business sense. The "low hanging fruit" has resulted in getting their asses kicked for years. Unless you're suggesting that they'd be doing even worse by catering, even in part, to the Fox audience?

ScottF

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #60 on: January 16, 2020, 02:56:17 PM »
And to be clear, I'm not defending/deriding any of them. Just looking at it from a commercial perspective.

TheDrake

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #61 on: January 16, 2020, 03:22:12 PM »
You're looking for engagement. You're better off having 10 people watch 20 hours a week than to have 100 people watch 1 hour. I think you'd find that an even handed approach would pick up the casual viewer.

TheDeamon

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #62 on: January 16, 2020, 03:38:34 PM »
If you look at the history of Fox news the decision to cater to the right was politically and economical. As you know people are attracted to information they already 'know' and want to be true. And it worked, Fox prospered and CNN faltered. CNN could have gone after Fox viewers (right) and hire right leaning journalists or they could adopt the new practice and go after the left.

They actually did make that effort, anyone remember the days when Glenn Beck worked for CNN?

The problem was CNN's staff leaned so strongly to the left even by then that the environment was consistently described as being "hostile" with respect to any openly conservative person who worked at CNN.

Quote
Does it make business sense?  Fox had one half of the population locked in why compete when the other half the population is up for grabs.  Low hanging fruit verses fruit hard to get at.

While there was a business motive to make the effort, there was a solidly established culture in place at CNN by the end of the Bush(43) Administration which made any attempt to remain in the center, never mind moving to the right, untenable in the views of those who worked there.

rightleft22

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #63 on: January 16, 2020, 03:48:30 PM »
Quote
Except clearly it doesn't make business sense. The "low hanging fruit" has resulted in getting their asses kicked for years. Unless you're suggesting that they'd be doing even worse by catering, even in part, to the Fox audience?

True it hasn't worked for CNN but it was understandable that they try to adopt Fox news successful model - the right.
Perhaps the left is more discerning then the right when it comes to what news they are willing to watch. who knew :)

TheDeamon

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #64 on: January 16, 2020, 05:06:53 PM »
True it hasn't worked for CNN but it was understandable that they try to adopt Fox news successful model - the right.
Perhaps the left is more discerning then the right when it comes to what news they are willing to watch. who knew :)

It's been awhile, but a number of years ago, Fox had almost as many self-identified Democrats watching it, and preferring to watch it, over viewing CNN.

I imagine Fox News still has a very substantial Democratic viewership, something that CNN cannot appreciably claim at this point I'd suspect when it comes to Republicans.

Pete at Home

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #65 on: January 16, 2020, 05:19:12 PM »
Quote
Except clearly it doesn't make business sense. The "low hanging fruit" has resulted in getting their asses kicked for years. Unless you're suggesting that they'd be doing even worse by catering, even in part, to the Fox audience?

True it hasn't worked for CNN but it was understandable that they try to adopt Fox news successful model - the right.
Perhaps the left is more discerning then the right when it comes to what news they are willing to watch. who knew :)

Here’s how I remember things. CNN carved out a niche of panic news addicted white closet authoritarians. Ran ram shot over us during the Rodney King riots, but there afterward FOX chewed off the right wing of the arthoritarian group and then the left fractioned off what was left. So CNN is like the point of impact from which all things “not right” proceed lefwardly like the empty corona of the leftward Big Bang.  . Right?

wmLambert

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #66 on: Today at 07:47:35 AM »
...CNN carved out a niche of panic news addicted white closet authoritarians. Ran ram shot over us during the Rodney King riots, but there afterward FOX chewed off the right wing of the arthoritarian group and then the left fractioned off what was left. So CNN is like the point of impact from which all things “not right” proceed lefwardly like the empty corona of the leftward Big Bang.  . Right?

Not exactly. The owners of the media made a decision of which way to go. When Murdoch's children took over at Fox, they were Left of center and did much to put the brakes on the Rightward lean of the Fox hosts. It was the investors on the board who liked the money coming in and kept the News side and hosts side different. The Fox-pejorative media are so alienated that it is hard for Fox to get decent Leftist contributors to provide truly balanced opinions. The same purportedly Leftward leaning contributors appear on all the shows trying mightily to provide balanced views.

The real problem on CNN, MSNBC, and all the others is the lack of national journalism to hold rabid bloviating in check. Research after research has shown major breaking stories that are negative toward the Left are not covered at all. All the bulk of the nation ever see is Progressive reinforced chatter, which is never balanced, even when proved wrong. The air is filled with disinformation which is reinforced by a complicit media. It is not just the networks.

ScottF

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #67 on: Today at 11:35:13 AM »
The idea that there's ever been such a thing as objective news reporting is a fallacy but back when TV was the dominant medium (say up until the mid-90's) there seemed to be less of a reflex to blatantly inject opinions.

Now that all of these networks are on the endangered species list, they've signed a virtual pact to ratchet everything up to 10 and make sure they aren't just relaying information but assigning opinions to their audience. The model is doomed but I don't think anyone has figured out what v2 should look like, or if TV v2 is even possible.

TheDrake

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #68 on: Today at 11:38:54 AM »
...CNN carved out a niche of panic news addicted white closet authoritarians. Ran ram shot over us during the Rodney King riots, but there afterward FOX chewed off the right wing of the arthoritarian group and then the left fractioned off what was left. So CNN is like the point of impact from which all things “not right” proceed lefwardly like the empty corona of the leftward Big Bang.  . Right?

Not exactly. The owners of the media made a decision of which way to go. When Murdoch's children took over at Fox, they were Left of center and did much to put the brakes on the Rightward lean of the Fox hosts. It was the investors on the board who liked the money coming in and kept the News side and hosts side different. The Fox-pejorative media are so alienated that it is hard for Fox to get decent Leftist contributors to provide truly balanced opinions. The same purportedly Leftward leaning contributors appear on all the shows trying mightily to provide balanced views.

The real problem on CNN, MSNBC, and all the others is the lack of national journalism to hold rabid bloviating in check. Research after research has shown major breaking stories that are negative toward the Left are not covered at all. All the bulk of the nation ever see is Progressive reinforced chatter, which is never balanced, even when proved wrong. The air is filled with disinformation which is reinforced by a complicit media. It is not just the networks.

Most of the stories pushed by breitbart and hard right outlets don't deserve attention, but I'm willing to be convinced. Let me know which stories you think are being suppressed.

Pete at Home

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #69 on: Today at 12:22:31 PM »
Well, there’s one member of SCOTUS who has been stalking the news critiquing the hard right while going on about how GOP senators x y and z have disqualified themselves from participating in the impeachment trial. Funny that no one is examining whether any DNC members may have by the same set of principles and assumptions disqualified themselves.

TheDrake

  • Members
    • View Profile
Re: Dem debates
« Reply #70 on: Today at 01:08:21 PM »
Quote
Well, there’s one member of SCOTUS who has been stalking the news critiquing the hard right while going on about how GOP senators x y and z have disqualified themselves from participating in the impeachment trial. Funny that no one is examining whether any DNC members may have by the same set of principles and assumptions disqualified themselves.

Is there some reason why you're being cagey about this? Hard for me to respond to vague allusions. And by definition, if they are stalking the news, then its not really being ignored is it? So maybe you mean to say that you don't like how they are reporting, not that they are ignoring?

Let's go back to your assertion.

Quote
Research after research has shown major breaking stories that are negative toward the Left are not covered at all.

If there is research after research, I'm sure you can name at least one study?