This should probably be in one of the other existing threads but they seem to be devolving into more political/partisan focused comments.
I'm actually quite excited at the UK's approach. For those who haven't read/heard: The UK is apparently taking a different strategy than the US. They are instructing everyone in the statistically vulnerable category (>60, other complications) to self-isolate. Everyone else, go about your business.
The theory is that the healthcare system is insulated from the most vulnerable requiring a bed and/or respirator, etc. while the majority of citizens will be infected and develop "herd immunity", as we have with other colds and flu.
I like this for two reasons:
- It might work. Everyone is a professional forecaster right now but nobody really knows if this approach is horrible or practical. It certainly is far less disruptive economically and socially.
- It serves as a real-time A/B test for the US. We will be able to monitor their infection and mortality rates and compare them to the US approach of "everyone self-isolate" - which isn't happening anyway. Granted, it could take months to determine which approach was more effective.
I hope it's the former, but rarely do you get a chance to see distinctly different models running side by side and determine which is more effective.