“ OK - I'm going to have to give you that the timing is almost certainly politically motivated. Hmmm... politicians doing politically motivated things who'd have thought that.”
Politicians managing one specific lawsuit from before it was filed—that’s a new level of dirty.
That isn't what I said.
I will absolutely give you that it looks like the timing of the NY law was passing was related to Trumps ceasing to be president. I'm not sure of the exact reasoning behind that though - could he somehow have got rid of the law if he was still president?
And I will certainly entertain the belief that they hoped that one of the many women who had talked about Trumps dodgy behaviour previously would find the courage to file a lawsuit against him, as well as many others who had historic grievances against other people that now wished redress.
However you have in no way proven a conspiracy whereby the entire purpose of the law was to achieve the chain of events that has occurred. Given the general #metoo climate it could as easily have been a reaction to that.
It means this whole farce was a show-trial not operating by the normal rules of law
No. Trump did bad thing, Trump was convicted of doing bad thing in front of a jury with evidence given etc. It wasn't just a case of "Lock Him Up"!