Pete's Prediction for Hillary's secret weapon at the DNC

[Pete at Home]

I respect scifi and dw, and show you more respect than Al does, but if you made the argument that Al made on this thread, reversing your previous factual claims and calling people fools or hypocrites for believing in anything, I'd call you on that bit of hypocritical nihilism.

I'm not here for respect any more than I'm here to witness mud wrestling in written form.

I honestly don't care if you two are civil to each other (or to me) or not.  I just don't find it useful or entertaining. (And there are rules even if enforced rather whimsically and intermittently here.)  For the record, in case it was lost on you Pete, I offered no criticism towards you and my plea was to AI. 

I see it now.  Sorry for misunderstanding.

Maybe I'll just go back to just clicking "like" on posts for a few more days.

Yikes.  Now THAT is a threat.   OK, point made.  And yes I know you an scifi care little about how much respect you have.  That itself is worthy of respect, whether you care or not.

[Pete at Home]

I think independent security experts have indicated that it appeared to be Russian hackers, but that is not quite the same as saying that Russia was behind it, of course.

Do you have any indication that the security experts are "independent" from the DNC?

I'm not sure what you're asking for.  I can't prove a negative, but I don't really have any reason to suspect that Shawn Henry or his company CrowdStrike would risk their professional credibility to shill for the DNC.

What I was asking for was exactly what you provided.  The names Shawn Henry and CrowdStrike.  Thank you.  And I see Fenring has already responded to this info.