I think we see a President who:
* Questions the validity of elections
Yep that was a horrible thing, that he wouldn't promise to respect the election in advance. Oh wait, we've listened to almost 3 years of complaints from those that complained it was horrible. How's that work?
Is it my imagination, or has Stacey Abrams conceded her election yet? I count several D Presidential candidates who've backed her on that.
* Diminishes and dismisses the free press
Lol, what free press? You mean the DNC State press?
* Ignores Presidential norms
Some, but sometimes that's a good thing, others a bad one.
* Degrades the role of Chief of Staff
So what? That's literally a role that is supposed to be what a President wants it to be.
* Says positive things about dictators
Is this about which dictators? Last I checked every President has had nice things to say about dictators.
* Loves a military parade
And?
* Suggests that judges can't be trusted
Like it's somehow a secret that some judges are more influenced by politics than the law? You must of missed when a TX judge ruled Obamacare unConstitutional and the Dems from Nancy on town called it out, or when the Senate Democrats sent a letter to the SC threatening them if they decide wrongly.
* Calls original articles of the Constitution phony
Yes, he called the way the emoluments clause has been asserted phony. And he's right, the interpretation is phony. There's plenty of legit argument there, but the sound bite sounds better without the context for you?
* Regularly purges cabinet members who contradict him
And? The purpose of the cabinet is to carry for his policies, not to undermine them.
* Thinks people should routinely ignore Congressional subpoenas
So do I, at least until they have a proper basis. Moreover, I think we retouch on the lack of Constitutional protections for witnesses that seems to be the belief for Congressional subpeonas. As far as I know, the court created Congress's power to subpoena out of whole cloth and they should put limits on it. Congress has subpeona powers to perform it's legitimate purposes not to be misused to support the DNC political goals.
How funny is it that Congress wants to impeach Trump for a supposed personal benefit, where he's actually doing his job, and there are absolutely no controls on the open political benefits that the House Democrats are seeking to gain. They've openly admitted that their strategy is political and about the election, specifically about keeping Trump from being elected, which is about a hundred times more evidence of corruption of their offices than they have on Trump. Yet, crickets from the ethics brigade.
I think someone can be forgiven for being at least a little concerned about his tyrant tendencies. That doesn't mean that many people think that he's about to engineer a coup if he loses the next election.
I think seeing tyranny in what Trump has done is a pretty big delusion. He's honored erroenous court decisions by appealing them through the process, where previous executives would have acted differently on a separation of powers theory. He allowed his control of the Justice Department to be undermined for over 2 years in a fake investigation that seriously undermined his own priorities and getting to the truth behind an illegal spying investigation.
You claim he's purged his cabinet, which he's entitled to do, but he's not cleaned house at the administrative agencies even with ample evidence they are undermining him and not doing their duty.
He's pulled our troops out of situations, rather than putting them in harms way.
Where exactly is the "tyranny"?