Election Results

[oldbrian]

William:
As a resident of eastern PA, I can tell you that our state legislature is dominated by republicans who toe the Trump line.  Very few of them would be 'never-trumpers'.

Also, since we are so close to NYC and NJ, our local news covers things which happen there which would affect us.  Such as Trump's wheeling and dealing from as far back as the early 80's.  We have known what Trump's character and thinking was from LONG before he hit the national spotlight.  Using bankruptcy as a business tactic might be legal and make you a 'financial genius' for doing so, but it does not make you a good leader or a good role model.

[msquared]

By Trumpist definition, any Republican who was not willing to change the election to Trump was a Never Trumper. It does not matter if they campaigned in Trumps favor, if they supported Trumps campaign or voted for Trump.  If they did not just delcare Trump the winner, they were Never Trumpers.

[Aris Katsaris]

Simple answer. Of course not. He may have won the election - but proving it is not going to happen soon.

Why are you hiding the "goods" (the data) that you claimed the "good guys" had gotten from military raids in Frankfurt and Spain where supposedly the American army fought against CIA mercenaries, supposedly proving the election was stolen.

You claimed the data was in the good guys' hands, but you are still not showing them to us.

What are you hiding, wmLambert? Are you perhaps part of the conspiracy to steal the elections?

[TheDrake]

Many professional software experts did attest that the voting machines did move Trump votes into the Biden totals. Makes total sense.

Really??  Which voting machines?  Who manufactured those machines?

Let's name names. 

Not even one software professional attested that any voting machines moved votes based on their professional evaluation.

And all these smoking affidavits, where are they? They're being suppressed, so one would think they would all be published somewhere for us to review?

[msquared]

And where is the Kraken? Sydney Powell thinks Trump will be back in the White House by the end of Aug.  I wonder what date they will pick when that one passes?  I know Jan 20 2025?

[yossarian22c]

So 2/3 of the voters not counted were for Trump. You should appreciate how Biden's largely unanimous votes that came in after deadlines said they should not be voted were not following any logical trend.

Where were votes allowed in after deadlines set by election officials and verified by the courts prior to the election?

We documented them in Michigan. Many affidavits did witness violations in the other states - yet the courts refused to look at the affidavits. Not because they were unknowledgeable or confused about the law, but because they were never allowed to be seen or evaluated.

wm stop saying many affidavits and many witnesses found violations. Go specific. The 3000 votes in Fayette county Ga is a good example. The election was run by republicans and during the recount/audit they found votes favoring Trump. Nothing similar happened in the Atlanta metro area to favor Biden. But stop this vague nonsense about "many witnesses," "the affidavits," "proven fraud." Be very specific. You don't have to detail all of them but pick the one with the very best evidence and lay out your case for how the election was stolen. Link to the texts of the affidavits, local media stories, but make your case. Quit repeating the vague nonsense you've been fed by the right wing media and get specific.

[rightleft22]

The language of GQP and the echo chambers requires one not to be specific. Its in the rule book

[Ouija Nightmare]

GA was run by Democrats? AZ? PA?

and education system designed by John Dewey to create lemmings

This is an interesting assertion. Go on. Back it up with actual evidence. I’m listening.

[msquared]

More MAGA people who called for executions.

https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/alan-hostetter-capitol-attack-arrest-fbi-020214596.html

Still waiting to see the stories about BLM and Antifa members who were there.

[msquared]

So is Trump lying when he says he will be reinstated by the end of Aug?  I mean even Serati and WmLamber both agree he will not be President then. So why is Trump pushing this idea?  Could it be to fleece his supporters for more money?  I mean they just did another opt out on his fund raising web site where they would automatically double your donation on his birthday. So they are still griffting their supporters.

[msquared]

They must be getting desperate.  Taking voting information to a secret location more than 1,000 miles from where the election happened.  I wonder what they are trying to gin up there.

https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/arizona-sham-auditors-transport-voting-113233458.html

I like the term fraudit. That is exactly what this is.

[TheDrake]

Meanwhile...

According to the conspiracy theory known as “Italygate,” people working for the Italian defense contractor, in coordination with senior CIA officials, used military satellites to switch votes from Trump to Joe Biden and swing the result of the election.

[Mynnion]

I am now wondering how we ensure fair voting.  The GOP has made a big deal about voting by mail, etc.  Now if the machines are hacked and votes changed maybe we should just call off the election all together and just take their word that they won 

[msquared]

They want you to sign your vote so that they can track you down afterward to verify that you placed the vote.  If you voted against their guy, nothng bad will happen to you, just death threats and intimidation until you support the correct guy. The old white guy.

[msquared]

The Kraken may get knocked down a peg or two.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-trump-attorney-vowed-release-182429503.html

If this case goes againts Powelle et al I wonder how that will effect the libel suite.

[msquared]

The GOP led MI Senate investigate charges of election fraud.
And found none.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/gop-led-michigan-senate-investigation-140136563.html

The Big Lie just keeps getting Lieier.

[Wayward Son]

The Kraken may get knocked down a peg or two.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-trump-attorney-vowed-release-182429503.html

If this case goes againts Powelle et al I wonder how that will effect the libel suite.

It's hard not to get sanctioned when you file court cases based on information "no reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of facts," to use Sidney Powell's own words. 

[msquared]

I guess getting sanctioned and loosing the right to practice law in a state is a lot cheaper than $1.3 billion.

[msquared]

And Rudy gets the first punishments for the Big Lie.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/rudolph-giuliani-suspended-law-practice-152949938.html

[Wayward Son]

The ruling from the five judges in the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court who suspended Giuliani's license was apparently quite cutting.  They pointedly pointed out specific instances where Giuliani prevaricated, misinformed, exaggerated, and out-and-out lied about the election being stolen.  And they weren't circumspect about it.

there is uncontroverted evidence that [Giuliani] communicated demonstrably false and misleading statements to courts, lawmakers and the public at large in his capacity as lawyer for former President Donald J. Trump and the Trump campaign in connection with Trump’s failed effort at reelection in 2020. ...

Respondent repeatedly stated that in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania more absentee ballots came in during the election than were sent out before the election. ... Respondent claims that he relied on some unidentified member of his “team” who “inadvertently” took the information from the Pennsylvania website, which had the information mistakenly listed (Giuliani affidavit ¶49) There is simply no proof to support this explanation. For instance, there is no affidavit from this supposed team member who is not identified by name or otherwise, nor is there any copy of the web page that purportedly listed the allegedly incorrect data. ...

Respondent’s mischaracterization of the case was not simply a passing mistake or inadvertent reference. Fraud was the crown of his personal argument before the court that day. In his opening remarks, respondent claimed that the allegations in the complaint concerned “widespread, nationwide voter fraud of which this is a part….” He persisted in making wide ranging conclusory claims of fraud in Pennsylvania elections and other jurisdictions allegedly occurring over a period of many years. Respondent argued that the plaintiff’s fraud arguments pertained to the canvassing claim, notwithstanding that there was neither a fraud nor a canvassing claim before the court. Respondent’s fraud argument spanned pages 12 to 31 of the transcript. ... Respondent argues that there was no misconduct because he truthfully told the court that day that there were no fraud claims. This defense rings hollow. … Respondent’s so-called admission of the true status of the case did not occur until he was pressed by the court to concede the point at page 118 of the transcript.

As for respondent’s argument that his misstatements were unknowing, respondent fails to provide a scintilla of evidence for any of the varying and wildly inconsistent numbers of dead people he factually represented voted in Philadelphia during the 2020 presidential election. Although respondent assured the public that he was investigating this claim, respondent has not provided this tribunal with any report or the results of any investigation which supports his statements about how many dead voters he claims voted in Philadelphia in the 2020 presidential election. ... Respondent claims his statements were justified because the state of Pennsylvania subsequently agreed to purge 21,000 dead voters from its rolls in 2021. This fact, even if true, is beside the point. This statistic concerns the whole state. Purging voter rolls does not prove that the purged voters actually voted in 2020 and per force it does not prove they voted in Philadelphia. It does not even prove that they were dead in November 2020. Moreover, the number of statewide purged voters (21,000) bears no correlation to the numbers of dead voters respondent factually asserted voted in Philadelphia alone (either 8,000 or 30,000). Clearly any statewide purging of voters from the voting rolls in 2021 could not have provided a basis for statements made by respondent in 2020, because the information did not exist. ...

At various times, respondent claimed that 65,000 or 66,000 or 165,00 underage voters illegally voted in the Georgia 2020 election. The Georgia Office of the Secretary of State undertook an investigation of this claim. … While a small number of voters (four) had requested a ballot prior to turning 18, they all turned 18 by the time the election was held in November 2020. ... Respondent does not expressly deny the truth of this information. Instead respondent claims that he reasonably relied on “expert” affidavits, including one by Bryan Geels, in believing the facts he stated were true. None of these affidavits were provided to the Court. Respondent claims that Mr. Geels opined that there were “more than 65,000 individuals who voted had registered to vote prior to their 17th birthday” (Giuliani affidavit ¶62). At a bare minimum, the statement attributed to Mr. Geels does not support respondent’s claim that the number of underage teenage voters was 165,000. But respondent’s statement about what was said to him is insufficient as to all of respondent’s statements on underage voters for other reasons. We do not have the affidavit that respondent claims Mr. Geels prepared and he relied on. We do not know when the affidavit was provided to respondent. We do not know what data or source information Mr. Geels relied on in reaching his conclusion, nor do we know what methodology Mr. Geels used for his analysis. Other than respondent calling him an “expert,” we do not know Mr. Geels’ actual area of expertise or what qualifies him as such. ...

On their face, these numerical claims [that between 10,000 and 250,000 undocumented immigrants voted in Arizona] are so wildly divergent and irreconcilable, that they all cannot be true at the same time. Some of the wild divergences were even stated by respondent in the very same sentence. ... He also relies on a “confidential informant” (Giuliani affidavit ¶82). We do not understand, nor does respondent explain why, as a private attorney seemingly unconnected to law enforcement he would have access to a “confidential informant” that we cannot also have access to. At yet another point respondent claims he relies on a Trump attorney who chooses not to be identified (Giuliani affidavit ¶43). Respondent also refers to hundreds of witnesses, experts, and investigative reports, none of which have been provided or identified (Giuliani affidavit ¶14) and an Excel spreadsheet, also not provided, purportedly listing the names of thousands of deceased voters who allegedly cast ballots in Michigan (Giuliani affidavit ¶51).

There's more.  It would be a good idea for anyone who believes that the election was stolen through fraud to compare their lists of reasons to those mentioned in the ruling, and perhaps cross-out those that these judges pointed out have no basis in fact.

I would also be interested in seeing the entire ruling (since this article only provided excepts).  If someone has a link to it, could you add it to this thread?

[msquared]

I wonder why WmLambert did not provide Rudy with all of those affidavits?  I mean they are all there, on the record, right?  Available to anyone to review? Transparency, right?

[LetterRip]

Didn't read the ruling - but I definitely think he should have been disbarred for the misleadingly edited video he presented.

[msquared]

So many Trumpist talk about false flag operations and now there is proof that they know what they are talking about, since they do it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/undercover-gop-operatives-trained-former-165609450.html

[cherrypoptart]

A false flag would be if the operatives did something terrible while posing as Democrats so the Democrats would get the blame. I didn't see any mention of anything like that. All I saw were people looking to expose the inner workings and possible corruption of Democrats and their organizations. In the old days that would be covered under investigative journalism, like when a journalist becomes an employee in agriculture to expose animal cruelty. Ag-gag laws have often times been overturned and the left led the charge against them. If it's right to expose farmers' cruelty to animals then it should similarly be okay to expose politicians' cruelty to people since after all humans are animals too.

[msquared]

Bill Barr and Trumps DOJ knew his claims were bull*censored*

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-attorney-general-bill-barr-124743756.html

But again, any one who disagrees with Trump is  Never Trumper or a RINO.  No possibility that Trump is wrong or a liar.

[msquared]

Well it looks like Powell and Wood may get sanctioned in Michigan for their frivolous law suits.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/judge-blasts-ex-trump-lawyer-sidney-powell-over-lawsuit-overturn-us-election-2021-07-12/?fbclid=IwAR1kYqRyg_OJ2PRrVo2vbpPUN50o5CQvWORz6c_n5S_cxxZXQL6DiR1BnN0

[wmLambert]

The issue has always been that the affadavits were never allowed into court to be evaluated. What affadavits are being referred to in all the pro-Biden reviews? We now know that Rona Romney and others never got behind any efforts to stop voter fraud, so just who was pushing for truth and honesty?

The audit in Arizona is ending, and the results show fraud. Now that at least one audit has proved fraud, how many others will follow?

In race after race, the idea that there is a red wave is accelerating. This helps to prove what the real sentiments were in 2020. "Republican Devan Seabaugh won a decisive victory against Democrat Priscilla Smith in a crushing result of 26 percentage points, 63% to 37%.The results in 2020 was only a few points different.

[msquared]

Wm

The results in AZ have not been announced yet so that is a bit premature. But of course they will say fraud since the guy in charge was sure there was fraud when he started. Of course they were not transparent with how they did the audit, or neutral with who was doing the audting, or following any of the accepted rules for audting, so we can trust them. Sure.

You are wrong on the affidavits.  Many were admitted and found to be wrong or mistaken and then thrown out.

If Powell and Wood have real evidence bring it to NewsMax or Fox or anyone and show it to the public. Why keep it secrect?  If it is so important, publish it. Let the world see.

But they don't do that. They keep asking for more money.

And loosing in court after court after court after court after court. 

Maybe all of the others never got behind the efforts becuase they knew that the big lie of fraud was just that, a lie.

You, William, and those like you who still believe the Big Lie, are the biggest threats to our democratic republic we have seen since the Civil War.

[msquared]

Seabaugh looks like he won a congressional district that has been Red for at least 8 years. And the Republicans seem to win at about that rate every time. So this shows a swelling towards republicans?

[wmLambert]

The rhetoric is also compelling. Biden and the Democrats were all about defunding police and abetting rioters. Now they say that was the GOP. No one here can possibly swallow that. Harris was pushing releasing the rioters and excusing vandalism and looting. She and many Soros-backed ultra-liberal prosecutors are letting dangerous criminals back onto the streets without even a slap on the wrist. Crime is up in the big Blue cities, and the chief of the border says she must only go to the "cause" of the problem, yet ignores the "cause" of violence. Biden meets with Lighfoot and never mentions crime in Chicago to her.

No one is stupid. These issues are there. Who argues it's not important?

[wmLambert]

In a poll shift that greatly upset Democrats, Republican Devan Seabaugh won a decisive victory against Democrat Priscilla Smith in a crushing result of 26 percentage points, 63% to 37%. In 2020, Rep. Bert Reeves, a Republican, won only by 12% but left the seat to take a job at Georgia Tech, The number of voters also was far greater than most off-election day elections.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakingnews/arizona-senate-president-says-2020-election-audits-ballot-count-doesnt-match-maricopa-tally_3900886.html?mktids=968ae5cf69d6254a4dbe3ac09987f5dc&est=hHW8hUxJ30Vgl%2F8TxTmkvqOa7NAWvMTILh1TlhB8lxnTVDqPhd5rVdN4mqRvMQ%3D%3D

Arizona Senate President Karen Fann on Tuesday said that the 2020 presidential election audit’s ballot count led by Cyber Ninjas differed from the Maricopa County tally, and that the discrepancy prompted the election review team to acquire new machines to recount the ballots.

“They haven’t released a number yet,” Fann, a Republican, said during in an interview with KTAR. “However, we do know that those numbers do not match with Maricopa County at this point.”

[LetterRip]

Arizona Senate President Karen Fann on Tuesday said that the 2020 presidential election audit’s ballot count led by Cyber Ninjas differed from the Maricopa County tally, and that the discrepancy prompted the election review team to acquire new machines to recount the ballots.

The reason for the new machines has a quite different reason according to those purchasing them,

Arizona’s largest county approved nearly $3 million Wednesday for new vote-counting machines to replace those used in the 2020 election, which were given to legislative Republicans for a partisan review of the results.

The GOP-controlled Maricopa County Board of Supervisors said the machines were compromised because they were in the control of firms not accredited to handle election equipment. Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, had said she would seek to decertify the machines if the county planned to use them again.

https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-government-and-politics-arizona-voting-election-2020-58e027040fbca3b72cfabf453c3b9f16

[msquared]

Wm

Fanning's statement just said the numbers did not match the county's.  There was no mention of fraud in her statement. You might think that it what it means. To me it just means that a bunch of untrained incompetent biased counters, using suspect methods, came up with different numbers. Surprise, surprise.  They are going to have to do better than that.

[TheDrake]

Biden and the Democrats were all about defunding police

Lies lies.

I will donate $1000 to the charity of your choice, wm, if you can show me that Biden ever advocated reducing any police budget since he began his run for President. Let alone using or supporting that phrase.

In his fiscal 2022 budget, Biden kept his campaign promise and proposed to more than double the funding for the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) Hiring Program. Funding is provided to state and local governments to hire law enforcement officers, thus inflating the size of police departments. In Trump’s last year, $156.5 million was provided for COPS Hiring, while Biden would boost that to $388 million, Justice Department documents say. In fact, Biden would boost funding for all COPS grant programs to $651 million, up from $386 million under Trump.

[msquared]

And all of the Republicans voted against it.

[wmLambert]

After all the assertions by the Democrats that there was no fraud, we now have authenticated ballot fraud from the audits.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/07/boom-arizona-senate-audit-team-caught-ballots-wrong-paper-stock-confirms-sharpiegate-scandal-video/

One point is that there was no fraud. Another point is that there was not enough to make a difference.

We know there was cheating. We also believe the numbers were so far in Trump's direction that the planned cheating did not alter enough ballots, so the bogus claim that the counting center had to be shut down due to a water main break (which did not happen) was used to get rid of poll watchers and allow illegal counting.

[rightleft22]

You know a lot of things

[Wayward Son]

But one of the things you don't know is ballot fraud. 

You do recall that, back in 2020, election officials promised that every single ballot with bleed-through was going to be counted.

CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, during an update on vote counting in Arizona Wednesday, asked Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs about it.

She laughed out loud.

“There is no concern about ballots being counted because of the pen that was used to make the ballots,” Hobbs said. “All of those ballots are being counted. And even if the machines can’t read them for some reason, the marker bled through to the other side, we have ways to count them.

“They’re going to be counted. There’s absolutely no merit to saying this was some conspiracy to invalidate Republican ballots. There just, there is no there, there at all.”

So those bozos found a ballot with bleed-through that the election officials knew about and promised that it would still be counted.

Where is the fraud again? 

[wmLambert]

One thing I do know is that you were wrong and those who spoke out were right. The auditors in Maricopa County did find fraud. Why claim they didn't?

We also now have prosecutors admitting they held off disclosing the criminal probes against Hunter Biden until after the election. Information that did affect the election. At the same time, we had Big Tech blocking true information, just because it would impact their favored candidates. There is no argument anymore you can make that does not impugn your own honor and integrity. Sorry. You can't.

[wmLambert]

BTW: Please explain why Hunter is not being pilloried for verified child pornography on his laptop?

[msquared]

Wm

I am not going to accept the Cyber Ninja's audit results because I do not feel that they were qualified to run an audit and did not follow accpeted practices for auditing election results. They had sloppy systems, untrained people doing the audit, their founder is biased, they used improper techniques and processes and were not transparent.

[wmLambert]

Wm

I am not going to accept the Cyber Ninja's audit results because I do not feel that they were qualified to run an audit and did not follow accpeted practices for auditing election results. They had sloppy systems, untrained people doing the audit, their founder is biased, they used improper techniques and processes and were not transparent.

All election auditors are untrained. The ones the election officials used were the same. Please understand why GA wants the election officials fired now: https://rsbnetwork.com/featured/ga-secretary-of-state-demands-election-officials-be-fired-after-fraudulent-ballots-found/

Yes, there was fraud, and most importantly is who has been defending it, and fighting to make such acts available for future elections. Just repeat, "It's all Jim Crow" over and over.

Also remember how Biden avoided a prison cell: https://neonnettle.com/news/15977-federal-prosecutor-stalled-hunter-biden-investigation-until-after-2020-election

[msquared]

You know that most election auditors are trained.

Here is the Ohio requirments.

http://glenn.osu.edu/training/oreo/oreo-attributes/course-list.pdf

Here is the National Conference of State Legislatures and how each state runs their audit.

https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/post-election-audits635926066.aspx

Most states have election officials, along with Party representatives, be involved with the audit. That was not done with the Cyber Ninja "audit".

Please see one thing. Almost all of the audits are done publicly.  The Cyber Ninja audit was not.

[TheDrake]

Wm

I am not going to accept the Cyber Ninja's audit results because I do not feel that they were qualified to run an audit and did not follow accpeted practices for auditing election results. They had sloppy systems, untrained people doing the audit, their founder is biased, they used improper techniques and processes and were not transparent.

All election auditors are untrained. The ones the election officials used were the same. Please understand why GA wants the election officials fired now: https://rsbnetwork.com/featured/ga-secretary-of-state-demands-election-officials-be-fired-after-fraudulent-ballots-found/

Yes, there was fraud, and most importantly is who has been defending it, and fighting to make such acts available for future elections. Just repeat, "It's all Jim Crow" over and over.

Also remember how Biden avoided a prison cell: https://neonnettle.com/news/15977-federal-prosecutor-stalled-hunter-biden-investigation-until-after-2020-election

200 ballots were scanned twice.

Atlanta Journal Consitition

Digital ballot images made public under Georgia’s new voting law show nearly 200 ballots — including one for West — that election officials initially scanned two times last fall before a recount. There’s no indication any vote for president was counted more than once in official results.

Double-counted ballots were discovered by voters suing Fulton in an effort to persuade a judge to allow them to conduct an in-depth inspection of 147,000 absentee ballots. The judge ruled against the plaintiffs last month, but the case survived with new claims filed against the county’s five election board members.

“If we’re finding this in Fulton County, we’re probably going to find it throughout the state. The question is, why did it happen?” said David Cross, an investment manager working with the plaintiffs. “The simple fact that it happened and we found it here means that it probably occurred elsewhere.”

Election observers and organizations say it’s unlikely that double-counting occurred often or in large numbers.

The ballots counted twice would have given Biden 31 extra votes. After a recount, official results reflected that Trump gained a total of 121 absentee votes in Fulton. Biden won the county with 73% of 524,000 votes cast.

“It’s Fulton failing to follow proper election protocols again,” said Carter Jones, an independent monitor of Fulton’s elections who found sloppy practices but no fraud. “Fulton is so poor at managing the actual process that if they had actually tried to rig the election, they would have bungled it and we would have found out.”

Jones said it’s possible that an election worker lost track of which absentee ballots had already been scanned in the initial count and then ran them through the machine again.

Every minor anomaly isn't automatically evidence of fraud, and certainly not widespread fraud.

Also this:

Other Georgia counties made larger vote-counting errors than Fulton’s during the initial tally.

Election workers in three counties discovered a total of more than 3,300 new votes stored on memory cards that hadn’t been loaded into election computers. A different issue in Floyd County led to 2,600 ballots going unscanned. Those ballots were included in the recount and in Georgia’s official certified results.

[wmLambert]

Actually, at least 200 ballots were proved to be scanned twice, with differing ID numbers attached to them, That is only what was verified. Since the complicit election officials did their best to destroy chain of evidence, and prevent proper auditing. The violations of State-sponsored policy was also proved. The problem is that policy is not a legal entity. It is simply something designed for the benefit of the policy-maker - not the policy user. The election officials saw fit to run willy-nilly over everything which enables cheating. Many mathematical researchers showed that the election counts were not just improbable - but impossible.

You can do a search through the internet and come up with thousands of Democrat-slanted "official" statements claiming perfection. Lots of Pinocchios.

You can also see how the complicit media and DOJ and big tech prevented all proven instances of Biden graft from being released prior to the election. Knowing that Hunter's business partner legally witnessed fraud by the Biden family with full knowledge of Joe was important. Knowing there was child porn on Hunter's laptop was also prevented from reaching mainstream America. Biden and his family are dirty and he was elected fraudulently. It was Trump deciding not to contest a done deal that stopped a possible Civil War. Trump getting back into power is essential for our nation to survive the Democrat chicanery.

[yossarian22c]

... Many mathematical researchers showed that the election counts were not just improbable - but impossible.
...

I like the maths. Can you name one of the mathematical researchers and link to where they showed the counts were impossible.

[wmLambert]

... Many mathematical researchers showed that the election counts were not just improbable - but impossible.
...

I like the maths. Can you name one of the mathematical researchers and link to where they showed the counts were impossible.

Do your own work. Almost everyone who posted such info is brought under the crosshairs to be cancel-cultured. You can attack people, but math is black and white. When there are more votes than legal voters, there is a problem. When legal copies are made, required by law to use non-bleeding paper stock, yet bleeds are everywhere, there is a problem. When hundreds of eye-witness affidavits are ignored, and a few officials, who have been proved wrong, are believed, there is a problem.

Face it. The one thing you can't explain away, is that votes from previously pro-Democrat voters swung heavily to Trump - except where Democrat vote harvesters got involved, and many of them where handed in after the legal admittance time had expired.

[wmLambert]

"A justice of the peace and three others in Texas were arrested and face 150 charges of voter fraud.

Medina County Justice of the Peace Tomas Ramirez was arrested and is facing one count of organized election fraud, one count of assisting voter voting ballot by mail, and 17 counts of unlawful possession of a ballot or ballot envelope.

Ramirez was arrested after a Bandera Grand Jury indicted him, Leonor Rivas Garza, Eva Ann Martinez, and Mary Balderrama on Feb. 9.

Garza, Martinez, and Balderrama each face one charge of organized election fraud, as well as multiple counts of illegal voting, unlawful possession of a ballot or ballot envelope, election fraud, and other charges.

Ramirez was elected to serve as a justice of the peace in Medina County in 2018. He has since been suspended from the position in light of the charges."

The key here is organized election fraud.

[yossarian22c]

... Many mathematical researchers showed that the election counts were not just improbable - but impossible.
...

I like the maths. Can you name one of the mathematical researchers and link to where they showed the counts were impossible.

Do your own work. Almost everyone who posted such info is brought under the crosshairs to be cancel-cultured. You can attack people, but math is black and white.

Do my own work on what? You made a claim. I just asked for who/what you are talking about. Do my own work reading your mind? Sorry not a skill in my possession.

Just post a link to one person who proved voter fraud with mathematics. I'm genuinely curious. And don't worry I don't have the power or inclination to cancel culture anyone.

[TheDrake]

He did it for the lulz

Ramirez, a Republican , was arrested after a Bandera Grand Jury indicted him, Leonor Rivas Garza, Eva Ann Martinez, and Mary Balderrama on Feb. 9.